| 查看: 2145 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zh5266779将赠送您 19 个金币 | |||
[求助]
PR applied重新投稿意见还是不好，求建议 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referees. The resulting reports include a critique which we feel is serious enough that it must be answered before we can reach a decision on the disposition of the paper. We append pertinent comments. You may choose to resubmit the manuscript with revisions you find appropriate. With any resubmittal, please include a summary of changes made and a brief response to all recommendations and criticisms. Yours sincerely, Juan-Jose Lietor-Santos Associate Editor Physical Review Applied Email: prapplied@aps.org https://journals.aps.org/prapplied Celebrating our 5th Anniversary. Physical Review Research is now open for submissions! As an introductory promotion APS is waiving publication charges for all articles received in 2019 and published in this new open access, multidisciplinary journal. https://journals.aps.org/prresearch @PhysRevResearch on Twitter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Second Report of Referee A -- NC10089/Zhang ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The author have responded to many of criticisms from the both referee. However, to my understanding, their action is not sufficient. I understand that there have not been similar analyses of experimental results as the author presents. Nevertheless, it is possible to compute the induced currents in all the configurations tested by the authors and then to compare the results with the experimental ones. The material is not a very difficult one for such theoretical analysis. And as to the relevance to applications, I entirely don't understand why the current study gives any contribution. Estimating the ratio of the mobilities and densities of electrons and holes could be done by other currently available methods, such as simple standard Hall effects or magnetooptical Kerr effects. Moreover, it is not clear why simply distinguishing electron and Hall contributions to the inverse spin Hall effects promotes the application. Without any comparison with results or analyses of conventional experimental technique, say, the ratio of carrier densities and mobilities, it is not possible to judge the reliability of the manuscript. I also stress that the terminogoly associated with the anomalous Hall effect is misleading, as the authors seems to admit in the reply. Even if the term was used by others in previous studies already published, it should be corrected or explained to avoid confusions. I strongly recommend that the authors expand the length to explain in more detail the motivation, the technical part of the experiments, phenomenological arguments, analyses of experimental results, and comparison with other works which are useful to estimate the phenomenological parameters. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Second Report of Referee B -- NC10089/Zhang ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The authors made a reasonable revision, and I recommend the publication. 求助，第一个审稿人似乎对稿件意见很大，不知道如何回答了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有4人回复
-
93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写
已经有7人回复
-
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有7人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有26人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有10人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有16人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有8人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有17人回复
mxnjfu
新虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 9890.9
- 散金: 3500
- 红花: 80
- 帖子: 7985
- 在线: 257.1小时
- 虫号: 471628
- 注册: 2007-12-02
- 专业: 环境工程
2楼2019-07-25 00:58:16
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4824 (副教授)
- 金币: 32452.1
- 散金: 21800
- 红花: 352
- 帖子: 11250
- 在线: 1526.9小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
3楼2019-07-25 07:02:06
40