| ²é¿´: 719 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
| ¡¾½±Àø¡¿ ±¾Ìû±»ÆÀ¼Û1´Î£¬×÷Õßzangshi32Ôö¼Ó½ð±Ò 0.8 ¸ö | ||
[×ÊÔ´]
¡¾×ÊÔ´¡¿Ò½Ñ§SCIÂÛÎÄд×÷³£Óþäʽ
|
||
|
ҽѧSCIÂÛÎÄд×÷³£Óþäʽ¡ª¡ªÒýÑÔ²¿·Ö ¶ÔһƪҽѧSCIÂÛÎÄÀ´Ëµ£¬³ýÁË´´ÐÂÐÔºÍÒâÒ壬×îÖØÒªµÄ¾ÍÊÇÕ¹ÏÖÂÛÎĵĽá¹ûÁË¡£¶øÕë¶Ô²»Í¬µÄͳ¼Æ·½·¨£¬½á¹ûÃèÊöÒ²ÓÐËù²»Í¬¡£Èç¹ûÄú»¹Ö»Í£ÁôÔÚÒ»ÖÖ¾äʽ£¬ÄÇÑù²»½ö»áʹÎÄÕÂÏÔµÃËÀ°å£¬»¹»áÏÔµÃÎÒÃǵÄÓ¢Óï·Ç³£ØÑ·¦¡£ÕâÀï¸ú´ó¼Ò×ܽáÒ»ÏÂÕë¶Ô²»Í¬Ò½Ñ§Í³¼Æ·½·¨ÈçºÎÉú¶¯µÄÃèÊö½á¹û¡£ Ê×ÏÈ£¬¶ÔÓÚÏÔÖøÐÔ²îÒì·ÖÎö£º 1£©Èç¹û²îÒìÏÔÖø£¬¿ÉÒÔÕâÑùÃèÊö£º a, ¡is higher/lower/increase/decrease¡in/by/withor after the administration of A than/compared with B£» b, Significantlyincreased/decreased¡was observed in A compared with B¡£ c, significant differencesin¡were observed/witnessed between A and B£» d, Enhanced/Decreased¡inresponse to A/B was observed¡; e, A showedsignificant/better effect on ¡than/compared with B; f, Asignificantly decreased/increase/improve ¡¡£ 2£©Èç¹û²îÒìÓÐÇ÷ÊÆ£¬¿ÉÒÔÕâÑùÃèÊö£º a, A similartrend was observed in¡; b, A compared toC additionally trended to¡£» c, ¡tend to¡in Acompared with B£» d, A tendencytowards higher/lower¡was seen in¡¡£ 3£©Èç¹û²îÒì²»ÏÔÖø»ò½á¹ûÀàËÆ£¬¿ÉÒÔÕâÑùÃèÊö£º a, No impact ofA/B/(A and B) on¡was demonstrated in the presented experiment£» b, No effect on¡occurredwith or after the administration of A/B/(A and B)£» c, No differencein¡was observed/witnessed between A and B£» d, There was nodifference in¡£» e, ¡in A and Bdid not differ£» f, ¡was notsignificantly altered by ¡-treatment¡£» g, ¡was similarin all (between) groups and ranged from ¡to¡¡£ 4£©Èç¹ûÁ½ÒòËØÖ®¼ä´æÔÚÏ໥¹ØÏµ£¬±ÈÈç¸ÉÔ¤ºÍʱ¼äЧӦ£¬¿ÉÒÔÕâÑùÃèÊö£º a, A treatment ¡Áperiod interaction/An interaction of treatment ¡Á week was observed for¡as¡£¨ÃèÊöÖ¸±êËæÊ±¼ä±ä»¯£©£» b, There was an interactionof treatment ¡Á time for¡¡£ ÁíÍ⣬ÔÚÃèÊö½á¹ûʱ£¬¿ÉÒÔ¾¡Á¿½«Á½¸öÏà¹ØµÄ½á¹ûдÔÚÒ»¾ä»°ÖУ¬ÓùØÁª´ÊÁ´½Ó£¬¼È¿ÉÒÔʹÉÏÏÂÎÄÏνӽôÃÜ£¬ÓֿɱÜÃâÁ÷Ë®ÕËʽд·¨¡£È磺 a, ¡in A and Bdid not differ, but ¡ tended to be higher/lower with/in A/B£» b, ¡remained at arelatively low level, although a trend was observed for the increase/decreasein A/B in comparison with B/A£» c, A/B were not foundto affect/have no effect on¡, but tendency to¡was observed in B/A£» d, Despite/Inspite of no effect on¡, A/B significantly increased/improved¡£» e, Similartendencies, albeit not confirmed statistically/although not statisticallysignificant, were observed in the remaining groups in which patients were¡£» f, A negativeeffect of¡on¡and a positive effect on¡were observed¡£ µÚ¶þ£¬ÔÚÃèÊöÏà¹ØÐÔ·ÖÎöʱ£¬¿ÉÒÔÓ㺠a, ¡is verynegative significant correlated with ¡£» b, There is asignificant negative correlation between¡and¡£» c, Rises in¡paralleledincrease in¡£» d, ¡revealed asignificant correlation with¡£» e, There was aninteraction between¡and¡¡£ µÚÈý£¬¶ÔÉú´æ·ÖÎöµÄ½á¹ûÃèÊö£º a, Survival curvesaccording to Kaplan-Meier showed: 1. Survival at¡years is¡%, with 95% CIbetween¡and... ; 2. Survival estimate is¡% at ... years£» b, Theoverall¡-, ¡- and ¡-year survival rates of¡were¡%, ¡% and¡%, respectively; c, The overallsurvival rates of¡were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier, with¡%, ¡% and¡% at¡, ¡and¡ years, respectively£» d, The survivorshipanalysis (Kaplan-Meier) showed a¡% survival of¡after¡years. µÚËÄ£¬Õë¶ÔÕï¶Ï·½·¨µÄÁéÃô¶È·ÖÎö£º a, ROC analysis of ¡..determined that the cut-off valueof¡yielded a sensitivity of¡%, specificity of ¡%, ¡ of ¡%, and¡of¡%£» b, A cut-off value of¡resulted in a sensitivity,specificity, ¡and¡of¡%,¡%,¡% and¡%, respectively¡£ ҽѧSCIÂÛÎÄд×÷³£Óþäʽ¡ª¡ªÒýÑÔ²¿·Ö ÒýÑÔ²¿·ÖÆäÖÐÒ»¸öÖØÒª¹¦ÄܾÍÊÇ˵Ã÷±¾ÎĵÄÖØÒªÐÔ£¬²ûÊö±¾ÎĵĴ´ÐÂÐÔ¼°ÒâÒå¡£ÎÒÃÇ¿ÉÒÔÓÃHowever µÈתÕÛ¹ØÁª´ÊÀ´Òýµ¼Ç°ÈËÑо¿µÄ²»×㣬Ìá³öÒ»ÖÖз½·¨»òз½Ïò¡£È磺 However,little information/attention/work/data/research(or few studies/investigations/researchers/attempts¡) (or no/none of these studies) has (have) been done on/focused on/attempted to/conducted/investigated/studied (with respect to)¡¡£ Previous research/studies/records has/have failed toconsider/ignored/misinterpreted/neglected to/overestimated/underestimated/misleaded¡.Thus, these previous results are inconclisive/misleading/unsatisfactory/questionable/controversial. Their studies may be more reasonable if they had¡consideredthis situation. Their results could be better convinced if they¡ Their conclusion may remain some uncertainties¡£ µ±Ñо¿·½·¨ºÍ·½ÏòÓëǰÈËÒ»Ñùʱ£¬¿Éͨ¹ýÒÔÏ·½Ê½Ç¿µ÷×Ô¼º¹¤×÷£º However, data is still scarce/rare/less accurate, we needto/aim to/have to provide more documents/data/records/studies/increase thedataset. Further studies are still necessary/essential¡¡£ In the current study we tested the hypothesis that a policy of active management of nulliparous labour would: 1. reduce the rate of caesarean section, 2. reduce the rate of prolonged labour; 3. not influence maternal satisfaction with the birth experience¡£ This study aim to/This paper reports on/This paper provides results/This paperextends the method/This paper focus on¡£» The purpose of this paper is to¡£» Furthermore/Moreover/In addition, we will also discuss¡¡£ »¹ÓÐÐèÒªSCIд×÷µ½·¢±íÈ«¹ý³ÌµÄ×ÊÔ´¼°ÊÓÆµµÄ¿ÉÒÔÏÂÔØ¸½¼þ |
» ±¾Ìû¸½¼þ×ÊÔ´Áбí
-
»¶Ó¼à¶½ºÍ·´À¡£ºÐ¡Ä¾³æ½öÌṩ½»Á÷ƽ̨£¬²»¶Ô¸ÃÄÚÈݸºÔð¡£
±¾ÄÚÈÝÓÉÓû§×ÔÖ÷·¢²¼£¬Èç¹ûÆäÄÚÈÝÉæ¼°µ½ÖªÊ¶²úȨÎÊÌ⣬ÆäÔðÈÎÔÚÓÚÓû§±¾ÈË£¬Èç¶Ô°æÈ¨ÓÐÒìÒ飬ÇëÁªÏµÓÊÏ䣺xiaomuchong@tal.com - ¸½¼þ 1 : SCIÂÛÎÄд×÷³£ÓÃ×ÊÔ´¼°·½·¨.rar
2019-07-01 09:10:53, 310.53 K
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐʦ·¶´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
071000ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
309Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
159413916672Â¥
2019-07-01 09:11
»Ø¸´
ÎåÐÇºÃÆÀ ¶¥Ò»Ï£¬¸Ðл·ÖÏí£¡














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥