24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4503  |  回复: 26
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

amzpotato

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 审稿大修已有15人参与

大家好,新人一枚!一个月前投了一个期刊,审稿意见为大修,编辑信如下。给了3个月时间修改,第一个审稿人提了很多充实论文的意见,这种情况修改后悲剧的可能性大吗?还有我大概修改多久提交比较好呢?跪求各位大佬帮俺解答一下。
A revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the referee(s) will be reconsidered for publication.

Please note that submitting a revision of your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your revision may be subject to re-review by the referee(s) before a decision is rendered.

You can upload your revised manuscript and submit it through your Author Center. Log into https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ima  and enter your Author Center, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions".

When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the referee(s) in the space provided.  You can use this space to document any changes you make to the original manuscript.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,

Dr Mohamed Seghier
Editor, International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
imaeditorial@wiley.com


Referee(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewing: 1

Comments to the Author
1- Some important and novel techniquse are missing in the literature part.
-Gu, Z., Cheng, J., Fu, H., Zhou, K., Hao, H., Zhao, Y., ... & Liu, J. (2019). CE-Net: Context Encoder Network for 2D Medical Image Segmentation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging.
-Öztürk S¸, Akdemir B. Celltype based semantic segmentation of histopathological images using deep convolutional neural networks. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2019;1 13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22309
2- The most important contribution of this study is upsampling of feture maps. Authors have to show this at the figure 1. Figure 1 is unclear
3- What is the motivation of Xcception block? What is the formulation of Xception block?
4- Section 2.2 has to be explained detailed.
5- Section 2.3 has to be explained detailed.  (Authors has to explain their parameters, their contribution, the different part of their methods in Section 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
6- Section 2.4 is not clear. Authors has to add figure.
7- TP, FN,FP explanations are generic. Authors have to explained these parameters according to their data.
8- Further research on the effects of network depth should be done and the results should be added.
9- Computational complexity should be added.
10- Visual comparison results should be added as a new figure.
11- More state-of-the-art algorithm results can be added.


Reviewing: 2

Comments to the Author
This paper conducted gliomas segmentation using multi-scale 3D Unet. To enhance the accuracy of segmentation masks, multi-scale features, 3D U-net with separable convolution block, and multi-pooling blocks were utilized. Performance was validated by comparison to multiple previous techniques using Dice, sensitivity, and PPV.

The manuscript is well written. But, I have a few inquiries and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

1. Table 2 shows the improvement of segmentation masks with respect to each component of your network, such as the convolution block, and pooling. Can you show the differences of segmentation masks according to each component?

2. Table 3 shows that the performance of the proposed method is less accurate than other methods. Can you explain other advantages of your technique (ex. number of parameters or FLOPs) in result and discussion section?

3. Table 3 shows that the proposed method can produce an accurate segmentation mask in whole but not in core and Enh. Can you discuss the reason for these results?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

1455947610

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
问一下,你投这个期刊一审花了多长时间呢?
16楼2019-06-21 22:12:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 27 个回答

冬瓜涂涂

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我觉得问题不大,一个月左右提交完全可以

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2019-06-18 21:20:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zkczhyzr

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
让你改就说明有戏,一条条改

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2019-06-18 21:20:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)


本帖仅楼主可见
4楼2019-06-18 21:22:08
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 大家能不能给点意见啊 +14 是小蚂蚁啦 2024-05-01 25/1250 2024-05-07 15:06 by 卓尔me
[考博] 求推荐博导 +7 想读博的我 2024-05-05 9/450 2024-05-07 14:57 by 安塔瓦拉多
[教师之家] 双非本科,学生又懒又笨。双一流本科好一些?入职门槛和考核要求比双非本科高多少? +5 河西夜郎 2024-05-05 5/250 2024-05-07 14:04 by 15512189958
[考研] 要不要二战? +7 ajjznskk 2024-05-05 10/500 2024-05-07 13:09 by 煎饼果子007
[基金申请] 祈福今年优青或者QB能有个好消息 66+3 5011fudan 2024-05-04 13/650 2024-05-07 13:06 by Kyokio
[论文投稿] 请问如何进行查重? 6+5 fc5878 2024-05-06 6/300 2024-05-07 11:58 by 柏舟0000
[考研] 关于要不要三战 +9 煎饼果子007 2024-05-06 13/650 2024-05-07 11:03 by maolC
[有机交流] 酰胺合成 +3 Spiralup 2024-05-06 7/350 2024-05-07 09:35 by 88817753
[论文投稿] 审稿人一收一拒,编辑给了修 +10 njuyck 2024-04-30 23/1150 2024-05-07 09:27 by BusyGer
[论文投稿] 投稿某一SCI期刊,论文被拒绝,是否可以再次投稿到这个期刊? 4+5 ilyzm 2024-05-03 9/450 2024-05-07 08:06 by 晓目崇
[论文投稿] 求各位大神推荐复合材料类中文核心 50+3 ayj080121 2024-05-01 5/250 2024-05-07 07:56 by 修为01
[基金申请] 2024国家自然科学基金资助额度 +13 i6277 2024-05-05 14/700 2024-05-07 00:24 by dxcharlary
[教师之家] 领导好安排自己做杂事。在成果上给领导挂名,请其不要经常安排自己做杂事 +7 河西夜郎 2024-05-03 7/350 2024-05-06 17:56 by lyfbangong
[论文投稿] 数据共用 +4 Zzd-zzd 2024-05-06 4/200 2024-05-06 15:23 by topedit
[教师之家] 校级优秀本科毕业论文,比例多少?看指导教师资历吗? +7 河西夜郎 2024-05-04 10/500 2024-05-06 11:33 by huaxuejidi
[基金申请] 多大算大龄? +5 wyjecho666 2024-05-01 6/300 2024-05-06 11:06 by 梦想成真2014
[考研] 考研日记 +6 九三hs 2024-05-02 7/350 2024-05-06 09:14 by 九三hs
[论文投稿] 想问下电池发在nano letters含金量高不高 +6 未来富婆蛙 2024-04-30 11/550 2024-05-05 10:53 by eemdl
[考博] 北京师范大学人工智能学院2024年第二批博士研究生招生报名 +4 taoto 2024-05-02 5/250 2024-05-04 15:46 by LYS1200
[论文投稿] 第一篇论文终于进去审稿状态了 +5 lizhengke06 2024-05-01 8/400 2024-05-03 09:14 by nono2009
信息提示
请填处理意见