| 查看: 4957 | 回复: 12 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
jk射手座新虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请问被 materials letters 拒稿后还能在修改后重新投稿它吗 已有5人参与
|
|
 如题，投稿ml的一篇文章审了一个月之后，今日看到邮件直接reject，还算淡定，首先自己准备的也是不充分，不过很感谢那位编辑老师给的意见，写了把九条，特别详细，也比较中肯，我复制粘贴一下邮件原文，请前辈们帮忙看看：thank you for submitting the above paper. we have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down. the reviewer recommended that a major revision is needed. based on the policy of the journal, a major revision is a mandatory rejection. for your guidance, comments from the review/s are appended below. thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. we will be happy to receive other contributions from you. yours sincerely, professor jenn-ming yang editor materials letters editor's/reviewers' comments: reviewer #1: the present article is certainly providing a new knowledge on fabrication of inconel 718 components using waam technology. in general, it is well organized, and it can be considered for publication provided the following issues could be addressed or clarified in the article: (1) in the introduction, the reference [9] cannot be tracked in the journal of mechanical engineering, it has not been found published elsewhere. please address it. (2) authors should introduce the cp-gtaw acronym when it first appeared in the manuscript. (3) what does it mean by the term 'section shrinkage' at the line 4 in the first paragraph of experimental section? (4) due to the pulse frequency in the range of 1khz to 100khz as authors introduced, what is the rational for selecting frequency of 40hz for this study? was it an optimized parameter from previous experiment? what is the influences of frequency on material property? (5) where were the metallographic samples selected from the as-deposited block? were they from vertical cross-section or horizontal plane? since anisotropic mechanical properties were observed for build sample, are there any significant differences in the microstructure at various locations? also, the correlations between microstructure and mechanical strength should be discussed comprehensively for this research. (6) provide clear images and markings for fig.1, bit difficult to read. (7) in conclusion, the grains were refined by ultra-high frequency pulsed arc. the decrease of laves phase and mc carbides should be attributing to the post-heat treatment as indicated in discussion. please make a correct description. (8) language is readable but really falls short of the standard required for a journal publication. i would suggest that it may be useful to engage a professional english language editor following an improvement of the paper. (9) this study provides information of material property analysis on inconel 718 structures fabricated by pulse arc additive manufacturing using high frequency. the novelty and impact of this article have, to some extent, shortcomings in my view. many previous researchers, see attached references [1-3], have been working in this field and similar results of grain refinement to this study have been reported when high pulse frequency. therefore, this manuscript would be better if authors could discuss the difference in inconel alloy deposition when the proposed manufacturing process used. reference [1] q. wu, z. ma, g. chen, c. liu, d. ma, s. ma, obtaining fine microstructure and unsupported overhangs by low heat input pulse arc additive manufacturing, journal of manufacturing processes 27 (2017) 198-206. [2] f. wang, s. williams, m. rush, morphology investigation on direct current pulsed gas tungsten arc welded additive layer manufactured ti6al4v alloy, the international journal of advanced manufacturing technology 57(5-8) (2011) 597-603. [3] j. guo, y. zhou, c. liu, q. wu, x. chen, j. lu, wire arc additive manufacturing of az31 magnesium alloy: grain refinement by adjusting pulse frequency, materials 9(10) (2016) 823. 以上是邮件原文，首先第一条那个参考文件9，是北航齐铂金老师的一篇文章，肯定是能搜到的，只不过原文是中文，我引用的时候写的是它的英文信息，是不是这样引用文献不可以呢？ 然后2、3、4应该是一些概念性的问题，因为篇幅限制，其实有好几个点我并没有展开说，估计是在这儿让编辑老师挑了下毛病，改起来难度不大，第5点是一个试验性的问题，我没有扩展说明，如果展开说了这个参数选定时的优化过程那可就多了，暂时还没想好怎么处理这一点；第六点是图的问题，我的错。。。。 第七点说的结论，我觉得编辑老师可能没完全看懂，热处理优化晶粒是一方面，但我是对比的传统工艺和我这个工艺都在热处理后，晶粒的细化程度是有区别的，所以在优化性能上更有优势，也许也是我的表述不够清晰。。。。第8点是我的英语表达，我在写的时候确实是奔着通俗易懂的方向写的，不过可能太通俗了，老师觉得不够科技文化吧，我的英文水平没有说多好的程度，但肯定不差，而且写的时候我下载了两三篇同样是这个领域，且已经是ml录用的手稿，边写边读，去体会他们的语言是如何表达自己的试验成果的，可能还是程度不够这位老师的标准。（这位编辑老师的要求感觉的确是挺严格的，我查了一下，应该是加州大学的一位华裔教授，确实认真）；最后一点可能是说我的新颖度不够，在后来给我列出了三个参考文献里，都是和增材制造有关的、优化组织晶粒相关的文章，论增材工艺的话，我的课题试验在创新度上肯定不亚于这几篇文章的内容，想请教前辈们，是不是编辑老师在侧面说我要改变陈述的角度，我这篇文章里没有把创新点给突出出来？？ 最后打算就是把这些问题都认认真真改一遍、检查几番，我也搜了下小木虫，投了ml被拒之后还能不能再投，有说能的，如果按照这位老师都改好了直接录用很容易中，也有说即使再投还是极有可能被拒，所以我又意识到这是个仁者见仁智者见智的问题，每个人情况不一样就不能一概而论了，碍于时间比较紧，暂时真的不知道如果改投其他能投哪里，所以还是打算修改后重新投，好在写这篇文章的前期我是做足了技术审查的功夫，基本没问题直接过了技术审查，还是我没有把自己的内容给包装好，希望重投可以有个好结果。。。祈祷祈祷！！！也请前辈们有什么想法可以对小弟指点一二，感激不尽，金币可以追加，小红花小红花！！！！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料科学（0805）338 求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
2026考研求调剂-材料类-本科211一志愿985-初试301分
已经有3人回复
-
085600材料与化工，一志愿广州985，求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
346分材料求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
288求调剂085600材料与化工
已经有12人回复
-
材料工程085601调剂求老师收留
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿郑大071000分数282求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
招调剂
已经有19人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有8人回复
9楼2019-06-18 22:51:50
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2019-06-17 14:05:38
qq1248359600
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1792.7
- 散金: 388
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 949
- 在线: 147.5小时
- 虫号: 4121737
- 注册: 2015-10-06
- 专业: 微/纳机械系统
3楼2019-06-17 14:49:01
editsprings 
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 794 (博后)
- 金币: 3322.5
- 散金: 3101
- 红花: 81
- 帖子: 1083
- 在线: 473.8小时
- 虫号: 4655759
- 注册: 2016-05-04
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
jk射手座4楼2019-06-17 16:11:03
6