| 查看: 1396 | 回复: 6 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者舞蝶飞燕将赠送您 6 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
有没有大神弄过ieice d 的copyright啊
|
||
本人向ieice d投了一篇paper，目前两个审稿人的意见都是条件接收，想问下各位大神是不是现在就弄copyright啊，还有copyright是从网上直接自己下载吗还是等录用后编辑发啊，我在网上找见了一个，如下图，如果是下面这个的话用不用学校盖章呢，其中的title if not author是什么意思啊，谢谢各位啦 TIM截图20190613212953.jpg |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
烦躁
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
系统里面怎么还是等待基金委接收纸质
已经有3人回复
-
寻找合作团队
已经有4人回复
|
另外两个审稿人的审稿意见都是条件接收，但其中一个审稿人要求增加额外的实验，原话如下： (1) Additional experiments. To conclude that the proposed method (SC-FD) outperforms the method in [2], the authors should show comparison on more than one dataset. 我在论文中只用了一个数据集做实验，那我是不是再增加一个数据集就可以了，还是要增加两个？ 我用公开数据集做实验时因为论文的目的只用了一部分数据，所以没办法跟其他论文的精度做比较，但我会建立一个基线算法如卷积神经网络做比较，这样可以吗，谢谢各位啦 Reviewer A (1) Additional experiments. To conclude that the proposed method (SC-FD) outperforms the method in [2], the authors should show comparison on more than one dataset. For example, reporting results on Skoda, Daphne FoG and/or WISDM v2.0 as in [2] would be good choices. (2) Analysis of hidden relations. ------------ Reviewer B ----------- 1. The equations expressed in the paper must be thoroughly reviewed. 2. The CNN models presented in the paper do not seem to include any fully-connected layer. 3. In p. 4, top right column, the first sentence reads, "the dashed line in Figure 2." There is no dashed line in Figure 2. 4. In p. 8 left column, last sentence of the first paragraph reads, "SC-BA can exploit temporal correlation of sensor [13]." I believe it is 'spatial', not 'temporal'. 5. The paper is clearly written overall, but could be improved. |
2楼2019-06-16 23:08:39
4楼2019-06-17 10:20:42
| up |
5楼2019-06-17 19:10:29
| up |
6楼2019-06-17 20:43:17