| ²é¿´: 276 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß´óÃôµÄÊÀ½ç½«ÔùËÍÄú 30 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
´óÃôµÄÊÀ½çгæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
µ¥¾§½âÎö
|
|
|
the problem is with the twinning. first, no mention is made of this problem in the manuscript. i used platon and obtained results identical with what was reported. however, when i looked at the outlier reflections, all had fo much greater than fc. this means that the platon correction did not account for all the twinning. this data must be integrated as a twin and a program such as twinabs used to create data sets. the large value of rw and the strange weighting scheme all support there is a real problem. @Monash2011 ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶ 285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
328Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£©
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ33È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ41È˻ظ´
331Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
298Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
100