| 查看: 1020 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【求助完毕】求英文期刊评审意见范文
|
|||
|
刚审完一篇英文文章，有幸当了一会评审，可是英文不怎么样，有些套话可能表达不好，麻烦各位给写个样板吧，非常感谢啦！ [ Last edited by qingshaojun0823 on 2009-8-14 at 11:25 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
298求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
272求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有4人回复
-
面上模板改不了页边距吧？
已经有6人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
317一志愿华南理工电气工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
272求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
化工专硕348，一志愿985求调剂
已经有6人回复
lby1258
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
地~~低~~
- 应助: 44 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 9.167
- 金币: 64442.8
- 散金: 8562
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 847
- 帖子: 55026
- 在线: 1965.8小时
- 虫号: 349039
- 注册: 2007-04-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机高分子功能材料
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2009-05-24 08:10:20
cxksama
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
玉树临风小纯洁
- 应助: 30 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 8.522
- 金币: 35365.3
- 散金: 8440
- 红花: 100
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 10344
- 在线: 1656.3小时
- 虫号: 536545
- 注册: 2008-03-31
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
★ ★
yurou1218(金币+2,VIP+0):感谢应助 5-24 10:30
yurou1218(金币+2,VIP+0):感谢应助 5-24 10:30
 恭喜恭喜，这篇文章你的整体评价是什么呢？一般格式就是先整体评价，然后逐条列举问题，以及修改的建议。 一般如果还可以的文章，你就可以在整体的评价中写： The manuscript under review provides a report of worthwhile results & should eventually be published. In creation of a revised manuscript, the following has to be taken into account: 或者This work and its results are of potential interest and deserve publication. 之类，然后后面的具体意见就可以根本你具体的问题来写了。 |
2楼2009-05-23 23:21:39
4楼2009-05-24 09:23:29
beibei9535
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
晕晕小版主~ 姑娘你好！
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 1.093
- 金币: 4037.5
- 散金: 5916
- 红花: 76
- 沙发: 19
- 帖子: 3211
- 在线: 1083.4小时
- 虫号: 769521
- 注册: 2009-05-13
- 专业: 微生物学
- 管辖: 海外院所点评
我刚刚被拒可以给你提供
★ ★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
SHY31(金币+2,VIP+0):欢迎新虫常来 5-27 10:42
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
SHY31(金币+2,VIP+0):欢迎新虫常来 5-27 10:42
|
可以给你看看 The mini review "******" deals with a comparison of a wide range of **and **. Here not only chemical analysis is the focus of this review- the authors also present the necessary involvement of ***and list them according to their advantages or disadvantages. In my opinion the review is well written and easy to understand. In my version of the manuscript fig. 2 was not complete readable because of low resolution- this might be a result of automatic pdf-compiling. The main problem with this manuscript is simple editing. The writing need to be improved as the current style makes it often difficult to read. For example, articles (a, an, the) are frequently left out making for awkward sentences. There are also some unconventional sentence structures and incomplete sentences. While this has little bearing on the scientific content, it is distracting to read. |
5楼2009-05-27 01:01:25
