| ²é¿´: 354 | »Ø¸´: 5 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| ¡¾Óн±½»Á÷¡¿»ý¼«»Ø¸´±¾Ìû×Ó£¬²ÎÓë½»Á÷£¬¾ÍÓлú»á·ÖµÃ×÷Õß hubeizlc µÄ 1 ¸ö½ð±Ò | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
hubeizlc½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿ÎÒÎÄÕÂÖеľä×Ó£¬Çë°ïæÐ޸ģ¡
|
||
|
ÏÂÃæÊÇÎÒÎÄÕÂÖеľä×Ó£¬¾õµÃдµÃºÜ²»µØµÀ£¬¿ÉÄÜ»¹ÓÐÓï·¨´íÎó£¬ÓÐʱ¼äÄãÄܰïÎÒÐÞ¸ÄÏÂÂð£¿Ð»Ð»£¡ 1.However, as compared with the common polymers, the poorer mechanical properties of B, especially the lower impact strength, and the higher cost, restrict its application in many industrial fields. È»¶ø£¬ÓëͨÓþۺÏÎïÏà±È£¬B½Ï²îµÄÁ¦Ñ§ÐÔÄÜ£¬ÌرðÊÇËü½ÏµÍµÄ¿¹³åÇ¿¶È£¬ºÍËü½Ï¸ßµÄ³É±¾ÏÞÖÆÁËÆäÔÚÐí¶à¹¤ÒµÁìÓòµÄÓ¦Óᣠ2.Though the crystallization behavior of B and its random copolymers has been extensively studied, the crystallization behavior of B based block copolymers has not been well understood. ¾¡¹ÜPBSºÍËüµÄÎ޹湲¾ÛÎïµÄ½á¾§ÐÐΪÒѱ»¹ã·ºÑо¿£¬µ«ÊÇÈËÃǶԻùÓÚPBSµÄǶ¶Î¹²¾ÛÎïµÄ½á¾§ÐÐΪµÄÈÏʶ»¹²»ÊǺܳä·Ö¡£ 3.This seemingly contrary result may be rationalized by Õâ¿´ËÆÃ¬¶ÜµÄ½áÂÛ¿ÉÒÔ½âÊÍΪ 4.The results of G2 agree well with the results of G1 as depicted in Fig.4. G2 µÄ½á¹ûÓëFig.4ÖеĵÈνᾧµÄ½á¹ûÎǺϵĺܺᣠ5£®Similar to the reasons of retarded effect of PPSu on G1, the decreased G2 by the incorporation of PPS is also due to the exclusion of PPSu segment, rigidity of PPSu segment. What¡¯s more, as indicated in Fig.6, G2 increases with chain length of B segment. It also interpreted by the reasons for the influence of chain length of B segment on G1, i.e., the difference in ¦¤T, number of urethane groups and allophanate crosslinking points. ÓëPPSu¶ÔG1£¨½á¾§ËÙÂÊ£©µÄÒÖÖÆµÄÔÒòÏàͬ£¬PPSu µÄÒýÈëʹG2ϽµµÄÔÒòÒ²ÊÇÒòΪPPSÁ´¶ÎµÄÅųö£¬PPSÁ´¶ÎµÄ¸ÕÐÔ¡£¶øÇÒ£¬ÈçFig.6Ëùʾ£¬G2Ëæ×ÅBÁ´¶Î³¤¶ÈµÄÔö¼Ó¶øÔö¼Ó¡£ÕâÒ²¿ÉÒÔPBÁ´¶Î³¤¶È¶ÔG1µÄÓ°ÏìµÄÔÒòÀ´½âÊÍ£¬Ò²¾ÍÊǦ¤T£¬¾Û°±õ¥»ùÍźÍëå»ù¼×Ëáõ¥½»ÁªµãÊýÄ¿µÄ²»Í¬¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
309Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϺ½ 335·Ö | 0856 | GPA 4.07 | ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çó»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085600£¬²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
0703 »¯Ñ§ Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸É½¶«´óѧ 342 ·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄÏ¿ª´óѧ0710ÉúÎïѧ359Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
085600£¬×¨Òµ¿Î»¯¹¤ÔÀí£¬320·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤272Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´

aizaianda
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
´óԪ˧
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 908.5
- É¢½ð: 79
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 704
- ÔÚÏß: 27.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 510698
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-24
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ó¦Óø߷Ö×Ó»¯Ñ§ÓëÎïÀí

5Â¥2009-05-25 22:57:37
pinna6356
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 741.6
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 164
- ÔÚÏß: 40.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 768342
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-12
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
hubeizlc(½ð±Ò+4,VIP+0):¸óÏÂÓ¢ÓïÕæµÄºÜ°ô£¬·Ç³£¸Ðл¿¶¿®ÏàÖú£¡ 5-25 09:06
hubeizlc(½ð±Ò+4,VIP+0):¸óÏÂÓ¢ÓïÕæµÄºÜ°ô£¬·Ç³£¸Ðл¿¶¿®ÏàÖú£¡ 5-25 09:06
|
½ö¹©²Î¿¼£º 1. However, B shows poorer impact strenght and has higher cost than most of the conventional polymers, which could restrict its industrial application. 2. Though the crystallization behaivor of B homopolymer and its random copolymers has been extensively studied, the crystallization behavior of copolymers of B has been unexplored. 3.This seemingly contrary result may account for 4.The results of G2 agree well with those of G1, as depicted in Fig.4. |
3Â¥2009-05-23 14:08:58
hubeizlc
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 593.2
- É¢½ð: 132
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 316
- ÔÚÏß: 137.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 292579
- ×¢²á: 2006-11-04
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ӻϳɻ¯Ñ§

6Â¥2009-05-26 14:53:35














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥