24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5327  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

smallbug2000

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] Pattern Recognition一审意见回来,求助是否重投? 已有3人参与

投了一篇论文到Pattern Recognition, 审稿四个月。两个审稿人,审稿如下,没有收到第一个审稿人的意见,正在联系编辑。各位看下,是不是有重投的必要,希望大不?谢谢各位了。

Thank you for your interest and submission to Pattern Recognition. Unfortunately, based on evaluation, this manuscript, in the present state, is not suitable for publication in Pattern Recognition. The reasons for this decision are explained below in the Editor's comments.

However, resubmission of a thoroughly revised manuscript may be considered. In the revision, all issues raised in the review process should be addressed adequately. If you choose to submit a revision, please include the manuscript number of this current submission and a point by point response to the comments by the editor and/or reviewers in the resubmission cover letter.  

Thank you for choosing our journal as a possible publication medium.

Kind regards,


Editor in Chief
Pattern Recognition

Editor's comments:

The paper in its current form has several drawbacks. First, the experimental results, as indicated by the 1st reviewer is not up to the standards of the journal -- quantitative analysis and comparisons with appropriate literature should be included. Second, the references to the literature need to be updated to include seminal and other relevant works - as it stands 80% of the references are from CVPR and ICCV. Third, the use of language needs  significant improvement, even at the abstract.



Reviewer #1: Please find the .pdf attachment



Reviewer #2: In this an incremental approach of the SfM method is proposed. The technique is based on clustering merging among overlapping methods. The paper is not well written especially in its statements and how the originality and the positioning of the paper with respect to other techniques. Some comments are:

1) why this clustering algorithms are supported?
2) how the "extrinsic parameters of camera corresponding" how these parameters are estimated?
3) the comparison should be extended to give some different objective values and comparison with other methods.
4) some techniques for 3D reconstruction using data from the web data should be mentioned such as
Makantasis, Konstantinos, et al. "In the wild image retrieval and clustering for 3D cultural heritage landmarks reconstruction." Multimedia Tools and Applications 75.7 (2016): 3593-3629.
5) the state of the art is not well described. In its present form, they describe only how the SfM works. In think that this section should be re-structured from scratch so that
a) a state of the art is given
b)  visual features papers should be described
c) methods for 4D and 5D modelling should be given such as
Ioannides, Marinos, et al. "Online 4D reconstruction using multi-images available under Open Access." ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Saptial Information Sciences, II-5 W 1 (2013): 169-174.
Kyriakaki, G., Doulamis, A., Doulamis, N., Ioannides, M., Makantasis, K., Protopapadakis, E., ... & Weinlinger, G. (2014). 4D reconstruction of tangible cultural heritage objects from web-retrieved images. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, 3(2), 431-451.
Doulamis, Anastasios, et al. "Selective 4D modelling framework for spatial-temporal land information management system." Third International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2015). Vol. 9535. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2015.
Doulamis, Anastasios, et al. "5D MODELLING: AN EFFICIENT APPROACH FOR CREATING SPATIOTEMPORAL PREDICTIVE 3D MAPS OF LARGE-SCALE CULTURAL RESOURCES." ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences (2015).
6)how different visual content affects the whole process?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
9楼2019-05-16 22:49:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

smallbug2000

木虫 (著名写手)

自己顶一下!不能沉呀!
3楼2019-05-16 18:31:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tunnel2015

金虫 (著名写手)

Reviewer #1: Please find the .pdf attachment 第一位审稿人的意见应该在邮件的附件里啊。
4楼2019-05-16 20:32:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youngen

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
smallbug2000: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助, 这个意见参考价值不大,看你第一个回复,送你10个金币。谢谢! 2019-05-16 21:15:45
意见好多。如果好修尽量修回重投,实在困难而替代刊物又不难找就改投吧

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2019-05-16 20:55:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +11 羊腰板 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-22 22:03 by lsbin3733
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-22 3/150 2026-08-22 22:03 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[基金申请] 93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写 +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-17 8/400 2026-08-22 21:55 by 医学老男孩
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-22 5/250 2026-08-22 21:54 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-21 7/350 2026-08-22 21:39 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +3 zjuhero 2026-08-22 4/200 2026-08-22 20:02 by mycsru
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +7 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-22 18:29 by 淀粉搬运工
[教师之家] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +4 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-22 16:52 by sunzitan
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +8 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 16:30 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +10 kulium 2026-08-21 13/650 2026-08-21 21:58 by alongwaytogo
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +11 大萍1987 2026-08-20 13/650 2026-08-21 14:48 by 20120902066
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +7 angus9576 2026-08-17 12/600 2026-08-21 13:38 by weiyin
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 估计是周四 +3 archvillain 2026-08-18 3/150 2026-08-21 01:48 by jnhyjjm
[教师之家] 为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低?主要原因有哪些? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-15 5/250 2026-08-19 20:23 by super2002521
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
信息提示
请填处理意见