| 查看: 604 | 回复: 0 | ||
[求助]
审稿意见看不懂，CdTe量子点合成方面的，求助大家！
|
|
本人投稿一篇SCI论文，是合成并对量子点进行了表征，表面包被剂是NAC，然后检测了量子点和蛋白相互作用后蛋白结构的变化。文章重点不在合成，在和蛋白的相互作用上。审稿人好像没有看懂我的文章，提的全是合成方面的问题，而且很多都是我文章里根本没有提到的东西，一点都没关系。以下几条查了文献也没看懂，希望大家能帮忙解释一下这些意见是什么意思，非常感谢！ 1. Author should distinguish between the self-correlation systems at micro to nanoscale? 2. In the present morphology of nanofibers is composed of numerous favelas and tiny nanoparticles of primarily HOZ framework, as implicit by the cytotoxicity results? 3. Why researchers to consider supporting which is recently it has been noticed that the Cd-Te nanoparticles electron-hole exchange interaction play a vital role in the description of the basic cancer properties of nanocrystalline assemblies it is appropriate? 4. How to rationalize the capecitabine defects versus the structure and emission of Te quantum dots? 5. How to acknowledge the suitable properties and response of nanostructures can lead to new devices for technology application? 6. Based on the emitting defects and aging capecitabine and CdTe nanoparticles both the optical excitation and recombination takes place inside the cancer particle? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
无机化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有118人回复
