| 查看: 3498 | 回复: 16 | |||
[交流]
SCI 论文投稿后因查重率太高而被拒，修改后还可以重投这个期刊么？
|
|||
|
编辑新建如下： Dear ***, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. As you can see, the reviewers have raised serious criticism of your manuscript. In view of the comments made, I regret to inform you that I must reject it and your manuscript cannot be further considered for publication in ***. I am sorry not to have better news on this occasion and thank you for choosing *** as a publishing medium. Yours sincerely, Dr. *** Editor Reviewers' comments: Editor's comments Your manuscript was checked for similarity content using iThenticate software by the screening department of the *** journal. It was found that there are some areas of text to the extent of 37% that are identical to other published manuscripts by yourself and/or other authors. This infringes on copyright laws. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有17人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
申博自荐 2篇一区TOP+1篇EI+2公开发明专利 2027博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
越来越担心硕士毕业后没有竞争力了
已经有12人回复
-
闲聊
已经有6人回复
-
申博求助
已经有4人回复
3楼2019-03-17 22:09:53
4楼2019-03-17 22:13:17
6楼2019-03-17 22:23:37
7楼2019-03-17 22:24:27
8楼2019-03-17 22:26:06
11楼2019-03-17 22:45:38
13楼2019-03-18 00:36:44
14楼2019-03-18 05:17:07
15楼2019-03-18 08:39:37
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
16楼2019-03-18 09:10:32
17楼2019-05-08 23:24:16
简单回复
time882楼
2019-03-17 22:07
回复
咪咕abby(金币+2): 谢谢参与
M塞北5楼
2019-03-17 22:20
回复
2019-03-17 22:30
回复
逝水无痕199010楼
2019-03-17 22:35
回复
咪咕abby(金币+2): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
1594139166712楼
2019-03-17 22:54
回复
咪咕abby(金币+2): 谢谢参与
