| 查看: 3084 | 回复: 19 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者su273435将赠送您 4 个金币 | |||
[求助]
如何修改审稿人的这个意见谢谢大神们 已有5人参与
|
|||
|
The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: https://ees.elsevier.com/ijleo/ 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, Muhammad Faryad Section Editor Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics Note: While submitting the revised manuscript, please double check the author names provided in the submission so that authorship related changes are made in the revision stage. If your manuscript is accepted, any authorship change will involve approval from co-authors and respective editor handling the submission and this may cause a significant delay in publishing your manuscript. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The authors have complied with reviewer comments and I satisfied with the changes. However, there are still grammatical errors found in many places. For example; pg.2 ln.28-32 "The titania(titanium dioxide,TiO2), as solar energy conversion, catalysis and health-oriented applications due to its non-toxicity, chemical stability and low cost." The authors should check overall manuscript again carefully. Therefore, I recommend minor revision for the manuscript. Reviewer #2: The manuscript has been improved accordingly, thus it can be accepted for publication. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
★
su273435(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2019-03-14 08:18:42
su273435(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2019-03-14 08:18:42
|
应该是一个建议小修存在语法问题，另外一个认为可以被接受。编辑采纳了第一个审稿人的意见。你要一条一条的修改。好像编辑让你确认作者的名单是否有误。认认真真修改问题不大吧。以上仅供参考，还是楼主认认真真看修改意见吧，免得有错，要谨慎又谨慎啊。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
2楼2019-03-13 21:49:41
3楼2019-03-13 21:50:10
4楼2019-03-13 21:50:44
5楼2019-03-13 21:53:51
6楼2019-03-13 21:57:02
7楼2019-03-13 22:13:17
8楼2019-03-13 22:19:00
9楼2019-03-13 22:26:52
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
10楼2019-03-13 22:34:14
30