| 查看: 510 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者yqy780808将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
[求助]
请大家帮忙看看，审稿人这个意见是什么意思？
|
||
|
请大家帮忙看看，审稿人这个意见是什么意思？ The result is robust and the content is easy to follow. I think this version has highly potential to publish in this top-ranked journal. But, I cannot see any managerial implications. The authors have to explain to users how to use this method. If the biased data set is re-balancing, the original result is change or not? Please explain it so as to convince the readers as well as enhance its readability. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有14人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有16人回复
