| 查看: 477 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者yqy780808将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
[求助]
请大家帮忙看看，审稿人这个意见是什么意思？
|
||
|
请大家帮忙看看，审稿人这个意见是什么意思？ The result is robust and the content is easy to follow. I think this version has highly potential to publish in this top-ranked journal. But, I cannot see any managerial implications. The authors have to explain to users how to use this method. If the biased data set is re-balancing, the original result is change or not? Please explain it so as to convince the readers as well as enhance its readability. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
070300化学279求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
土木水利专硕276分求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
328求调剂
已经有16人回复
-
化学工程调剂289
已经有26人回复
-
331求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料与化工专硕306分找合适调剂
已经有24人回复
-
材料工程调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料专硕调剂
已经有14人回复
-
334求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
材料工程085601，270求调剂
已经有10人回复
