| ²é¿´: 228 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
zi_shuľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇóÖúÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµÄ·Òë
|
||
|
ÇóÖú¸÷λ°ïæ·ÒëһϠWould a co-doping with Ce not tip the unknown electron or hole trapping balance towards preferential hole capturing by Ca-vacancies? (also, there is a typo in the equation - there are two Ce ions at the Ca sites, not vice versa). |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
081700£¬311£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤085600 310·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤371Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
336²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤085600Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ334Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
331Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
332Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϾ©º½¿Õº½Ìì´óѧ ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤329·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
wanglu3353
½û³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
zi_shu(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):лл£¬²»¹ýÖ÷ÒªÊÇÇ°ÃæÄǾäÊÇʲôÒâ˼? 5-9 17:56
zi_shu(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):лл£¬²»¹ýÖ÷ÒªÊÇÇ°ÃæÄǾäÊÇʲôÒâ˼? 5-9 17:56
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
2Â¥2009-05-08 10:54:12
myhaoqq
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
Сľ³æ¾¯±¸Ë¾ÁîÔ±
- ·ÒëEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 17 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 6846.9
- É¢½ð: 100
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1859
- ÔÚÏß: 47.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 334363
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÄÜÔ´»¯¹¤
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
zi_shu(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):¶àлÁË 5-10 13:31
zi_shu(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):¶àлÁË 5-10 13:31
|
Would a co-doping with Ce not tip the unknown electron or hole trapping balance towards preferential hole capturing by Ca-vacancies? ¹²²ôîæÃ»ÓÐ˵Ã÷δ֪µÄµç×Ó»ò±»¶ÔÓڸƿÕȱÓÅÏȲ¶»ñµÄ¿ÕѨƽºâ£¿ ½ö¹©²Î¿¼£¡ |

3Â¥2009-05-09 21:07:53














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥