| 查看: 413 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wangbi3077将赠送您 300 个金币 | ||
[求助]
有关EDX问题求助
|
||
|
恳求各位大佬帮我看一下审稿人的意思。 "- For SEM/EDX accuracy and sum of mass% is missing. If the latter is more than a few at.% away from 100 the measurement cannot considered to be reliable. In “Experimental Procedure” there is not any information to the calibration for EDX measurements. Please add all this information to Table 2+3. 我后来在表中添加了每个相测量后的标准差。回复如下 Re: The results of the element analysis were obtained with INCA Energy software by Oxford Instruments. The XPP matrix correction scheme of Pouchou and Pichoir provided by the software is used, for its favorable performance when tilted samples consisting light elements in a heavy matrix. The standards referencing used in this EDS system is virtual standard sample library. And, the instrument is corrected every two years with the Oxford SPI standard samples by the professional engineer. To minimize the error, the compositions reported in this paper were the averages of at least five measurement 审稿人还是不满意，回复如下 The sum of mass% which is easily available from INKA is still not given in Table 2. This information is important! The given errors are partly unrealistic, e.g. C4, at% of Al in "MnSn2" is given as 0.5(0.1). This error comes may be from statistics of several measurements but does not include systematic errors. The determination of light elements within a matrix of rather heavy elements has for sure an error of more than 0.5 at.%, which is considered to be the minimum error of conventional SEM/EDX method. 我不太懂他是什么意思，是在表中加入每个相的质量总和吗？可是这总和不都是100%吗？恳求大神帮忙解惑。  1111111111111111111111.png |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有16人回复
-
我不理解！
已经有22人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有4人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有10人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有3人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有5人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有10人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有25人回复
-
2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件，有关系吗？
已经有28人回复
投票:
