| ²é¿´: 162 | »Ø¸´: 0 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
2002040325Ìú³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿¼±Çó£ºÉñ¾ÍøÂçÄâºÏ·ÇÏßÐÔº¯ÊýµÄÎÊÌ⣡£¡£¡
|
||
|
±¾ÈËÏÖÔÚÓà ¡±¾¶Ïò»ùÉñ¾ÍøÂç¡° ÄâºÏÒ»ÌõÀàËÆÓÚ ¡±Ö¸ÊýÇúÏß¡° µÄº¯Êý£¬ÄâºÏµÄÏà¶ÔÎó²îСÓÚ2.5%£¬Âú×ãÁËʵÑéµÄÐèÒª¡£ÍøÂçµÄÊäÈëºÍÊä³öÏòÁ¿¶¼ÊÇһάµÄ£¬Ñù±¾ÈÝÁ¿Îª50¡£ÑµÁ·¹ý³ÌÖУ¬ÊäÈëºÍÊä³öÏòÁ¿¾¹ýlogº¯ÊýºÍ¹éÒ»»¯·¨Ô¤´¦Àí£¬²¢²ÉÓÃÁËÁôÒ»·¨½»²æÑéÖ¤¡£ÎÄÕÂÐÞ»ØÊ±£¬Éó¸åÈËÌá³öÁËÐí¶àµÄÎÊÌ⣬ÓÐЩºÜÄѻشð£¬Ï£ÍûÄܵõ½Éñ¾ÍøÂç¸ßÊÖµÄÖ¸µã£¡ÎÒ¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ðÕâЩÎÊÌâÄØ£¿ 1. Certain authors claim an ANN should use at least 5 sample points per connection weight . I believe this is far away from the conditions used by the authors. How was this limitation circumvented by authors? 2. Is there a criteria to choose to normalize data in the interval [0,1] ? 3. Can the authors justify that total numeric range is narrowed and simultaneously the resulting values are uniformly weighed? 4. The use of leave-one-out cross validation implies that the overfitting must be taken into account. This is done in the case of lack of enough input data, given a single sample is excluded each time. In fact, a k-fold-cross validation is much more confident in this respect. Can the authors comment on this point? |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
±¾¿Æ211£¬293·ÖÇëÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
085400µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢319Çóµ÷¼Á£¨½ÓÊÜ¿çרҵµ÷¼Á£©
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
268Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
һ־Ը˫·Ç085502£¬267·Ö£¬¹ýËļ¶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸085404£¬×Ü·Ö291£¬Ëļ¶Òѹý£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
26µ÷¼Á 086003
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
271·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁѧУ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥