24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 6504  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

2959638982

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] IEEE Access 审稿意见求助 已有6人参与

论文一审意见回来了,两个审稿人,一个Accept(minor editor),一个reject( update and resubmit encouraged)
编辑给的拒稿重投:
n view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access.
We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your paper once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers.  I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article.  IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, we need to reject an article even if it requires minor revisions.


两个审稿人,Accepted的意见很好回复。
reject的意见:
Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)

Comments:
While a new architecture is proposed, its not very far from LSTM-DNN combinations that exist today. I would ask the authors to draw the following comparisons:
1. A comparison with gated RNN, and deep gated RNN
2. Comparison with HTM sequence learning architecture
3. Comparisons with hierarchical convolutional networks
4. Analysis related to learning speeds for each of the algorithms
5. Performance analysis on the impact of noisy data
6.  Include details and experimental analysis, on how regularisation is done for this network.

The writing needs a lot of improvement, such as sentence structure, citations and quality of the figures.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: yes, partly

Is the paper technically sound?: Needs to be improved.

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: More work to be done

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Not sufficient


这个重投希望大吗?  如果重投,如何根据第二个评审人的意见改?我对这几个评审意见比较懵
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

2959638982

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 龙的船人 at 2018-12-20 12:18:10
好好改改再试试呗,有希望就不要放弃

感觉不是很好改啊,,工作量好大
3楼2018-12-20 16:40:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

龙的船人

银虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
好好改改再试试呗,有希望就不要放弃

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2018-12-20 12:18:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shaw820

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
sci论文修改就一条标准,跪舔审稿人就完事了。哪怕审稿人没看懂文章或者提的问题无法修改,那也是跪舔审稿人,小心翼翼的回答
5楼2018-12-20 18:50:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

2959638982

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by shaw820 at 2018-12-20 18:50:02
sci论文修改就一条标准,跪舔审稿人就完事了。哪怕审稿人没看懂文章或者提的问题无法修改,那也是跪舔审稿人,小心翼翼的回答

哈哈哈,说的好。不过我对他的comments有疑问,比如gated rnn,还有第6条正则化的情况,,不理解,要是我改的和他想的不同,,那就尴尬了
6楼2018-12-20 21:01:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见