| 查看: 979 | 回复: 8 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价7次，作者zxzj05增加金币 6.5 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
【分享】三类分子动力学
|
||
|
Classical Molecular Dynamics Simulation In classical molecular dynamics simulations, the classical interatomic potentials are used to crudely approximate the true quantum mechanical potentials since classical forces can be rapidly evaluated. State of the art classical molecular dynamics scheme can calculate the atoms with size up to multimillion atoms. Vashishta et al. constructed meaningful models of glassy GeSe2 and other amorphous materials. Tight-binding Molecular Dynamics Simulation Tight-binding molecular dynamics (TBMD) is designed to run moderate molecular dynamics simulation within the semi-empirical tight-binding scheme. The electronic structure of the simulated system is calculated by a TB hamiltonian so that the quantum mechanical many-body nature of the interatomic forces is naturally taken into account. Sankey and Allen used a tight binding Hamiltonian to do MD first in 1986. The best order N TBMD code now can calculate with size up to several thousand atoms. Ab initio Molecular Dynamics Simulation In mid eighties, Car and Parrinello showed how to combine the accuracy of ab initio density functional methods with force calculations and molecular dynamics techniques. In ab initio MD, the nuclei are treated as classical particles which move in a potential determined by the atomistic force calculated by the density functional theory due to Kohn, Hohenberg and Sham. Now, the state of art MD simulation can be applied for several hundred atoms. For ab initio method, the only information which must be provided are the atomic numbers and positions of the atoms within the system. In contrast, empirical or semi-empirical approaches require a model of the interactions between the atoms to be supplied. The parameters of these models are usually derived by fitting the outcome of simulations to experimental data. Problems with these techniques arise when one considers the range of their applicability. If the parameters of the models were derived from system A, what guarantee is there that they apply to system B with different chemical bonding and/or topology? In a disordered environment, it is very hard to find a universal set of parameters for the classical or semi-classical potentials. As a result, large numbers of fitting parameters are usually needed for either empirical potentials or tight-binding models. In this respect, ab initio MD in which the interatomic potential is determined by the electronic structure of the system is the method of choice to model complex amorphous materials. [ Last edited by fegg7502 on 2009-12-8 at 23:59 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
【修正版】单环用磁约束低速电子实验方案（简化版）
已经有0人回复
-
桂林理工大学物理学专业招收调剂，还有三个名额！！！
已经有22人回复
-
物理学I论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有129人回复
-
考博自荐
已经有4人回复
-
山东大学第二批博士研究生招生
已经有0人回复
-
中国科学院东莞材料科学与技术研究所-2026年博士招生-吴昊研究员-磁学与自旋电子学
已经有0人回复
-
《电磁学》教材推荐
已经有1人回复
-
【急招】合肥工大核聚变材料计算方向2026级工程博士生
已经有4人回复
-
大豆异黄酮分离
已经有0人回复
-
湖南大学材料学院急招2026年博士生，临时增加一名博士联培指标
已经有10人回复
-
天津理工大学晶体材料全国重点实验室刘红军教授课题组招收博士生1-2名
已经有0人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
2楼2009-04-29 11:25:52
4楼2009-06-13 21:26:18
5楼2009-12-08 23:59:45
8楼2010-01-28 03:37:09
9楼2010-01-28 08:24:19
简单回复
2009-06-01 16:22
回复
mingdong6楼
2009-12-10 12:55
回复
cadick7楼
2010-01-28 00:15
回复
