24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2521  |  回复: 5

大药丸子

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] design expert 结果处理

请问design expert 设计结果怎么分析,是否可行?

发自小木虫Android客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

赵统超

木虫 (正式写手)

2楼2018-11-30 20:01:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

大药丸子

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 赵统超 at 2018-11-30 20:01:17
你这么发帖谁能看懂

Use your mouse to right click on individual cells for definitions.
Response        1        温度
        ANOVA for Response Surface Linear Model
Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares - Type III]
        Sum of                Mean        F        p-value
Source        Squares        df        Square        Value        Prob > F
Model        149.55        2        74.78        17.22        0.0013        significant
  A-P188        98.84        1        98.84        22.77        0.0014
  B-P407        62.43        1        62.43        14.38        0.0053
Residual        34.73        8        4.34
Lack of Fit        34.61        6        5.77        92.28        0.0108        significant
Pure Error        0.13        2        0.063
Cor Total        184.28        10

The Model F-value of 17.22 implies the model is significant.  There is only
a 0.13% chance that a "Model F-Value" this large could occur due to noise.

Values of "Prob > F" less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant.  
In this case A, B are significant model terms.  
Values greater than 0.1000 indicate the model terms are not significant.  
If there are many insignificant model terms (not counting those required to support hierarchy),  
model reduction may improve your model.

The "Lack of Fit F-value" of 92.28 implies the Lack of Fit is significant.  There is only a
1.08% chance that a "Lack of Fit F-value" this large could occur due to noise.
Significant lack of fit is bad -- we want the model to fit.

Std. Dev.        2.08        R-Squared        0.8115
Mean        35.33        Adj R-Squared        0.7644
C.V. %        5.90        Pred R-Squared        0.6279
PRESS        68.56        Adeq Precision        10.548

The "Pred R-Squared" of 0.6279 is in reasonable agreement with the "Adj R-Squared" of 0.7644.

"Adeq Precision" measures the signal to noise ratio.  A ratio greater than 4 is desirable.  Your
ratio of 10.548 indicates an adequate signal.  This model can be used to navigate the design space.

Coefficient        Standard        95% CI        95% CI
Factor        Estimate        df        Error        Low        High        VIF
Intercept        34.89        1        0.65        33.40        36.38
A-P188        3.08        1        0.65        1.59        4.57        1.01
B-P407        -2.66        1        0.70        -4.27        -1.04        1.01



Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors:

温度         =
+34.89
+3.08         * A
-2.66         * B

Final Equation in Terms of Actual Factors:

温度         =
+54.85949
+2.46604         * P188
-1.32795         * P407


The Diagnostics Case Statistics Report has been moved to the Diagnostics Node.
In the Diagnostics Node, Select Case Statistics from the View Menu.

Proceed to Diagnostic Plots (the next icon in progression).  Be sure to look at the:
   1) Normal probability plot of the studentized residuals to check for normality of residuals.
   2) Studentized residuals versus predicted values to check for constant error.
   3) Externally Studentized Residuals to look for outliers, i.e., influential values.
   4) Box-Cox plot for power transformations.

If all the model statistics and diagnostic plots are OK, finish up with the Model Graphs icon.
3楼2018-11-30 22:17:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

大药丸子

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 赵统超 at 2018-11-30 20:01:17
你这么发帖谁能看懂

这个设计的结果可行吗?谢谢啦
4楼2018-11-30 22:18:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

赵统超

木虫 (正式写手)

回归系数有点低,拟合程度不是很好

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2018-12-01 13:27:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

大药丸子

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 赵统超 at 2018-12-01 13:27:10
回归系数有点低,拟合程度不是很好

怎么看出来的,需要看哪些数据

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2018-12-01 21:30:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 大药丸子 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[论文投稿] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:25 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +7 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 8/400 2026-08-30 01:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-30 01:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +6 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-30 01:04 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 6/300 2026-08-30 01:03 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 5/250 2026-08-30 00:52 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 5/250 2026-08-30 00:41 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[考博] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 jCd0dEvKHShX 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 23:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 国社科申报系统有变化 +3 kynobel 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-29 21:57 by 余韵清
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-29 21:44 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[公派出国] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 21:32 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-29 21:22 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[教师之家] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-29 09:26 by G6APbkg8SA6w
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +12 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 13/650 2026-08-29 00:04 by superceng
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
信息提示
请填处理意见