| 查看: 246 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价1次，作者听不进增加金币 0.5 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
【分享】正义、幸福和知识【已搜无重复】
|
||
|
The recent past has seen striking advances in our understanding of both moral responsibility and distributive justice. S. L. Hurley's ambitious work brings these two areas of lively debate into overdue contact with each other. Key contemporary discussions of distributive justice have formulated egalitarian approaches in terms of responsibility; in this view, the aim of egalitarianism is to respect differences between positions for which people are responsible while neutralizing differences that are a matter of luck. But this approach, Hurley contends, has ignored the way our understanding of responsibility constrains the roles it can actually play within distributive justice. Her book brings the new articulation of responsibility to bear in explaining these constraints. While responsibility might help specify what to distribute, it cannot tell us how to distribute; thus, Hurley argues, responsibility cannot tell us to distribute in an egalitarian pattern in particular. It can, however, play other important roles in a theory of justice, in relation to incentive-seeking behavior and well-being. Hurley's book proposes a new, bias-neutralizing approach to distributive justice that places responsibility in these less problematic roles. http://rapidshare.com/files/223475245/__27491___20041___12289___24184___31119___21644___30693___35782_.pdf.html [ Last edited by 梅若鸣 on 2009-6-18 at 07:53 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有6人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有17人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有19人回复
-
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有16人回复
简单回复
疏影25352楼
2009-04-20 17:17
回复
20