| 查看: 224 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价1次，作者听不进增加金币 0.5 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
【分享】正义、幸福和知识【已搜无重复】
|
||
|
The recent past has seen striking advances in our understanding of both moral responsibility and distributive justice. S. L. Hurley's ambitious work brings these two areas of lively debate into overdue contact with each other. Key contemporary discussions of distributive justice have formulated egalitarian approaches in terms of responsibility; in this view, the aim of egalitarianism is to respect differences between positions for which people are responsible while neutralizing differences that are a matter of luck. But this approach, Hurley contends, has ignored the way our understanding of responsibility constrains the roles it can actually play within distributive justice. Her book brings the new articulation of responsibility to bear in explaining these constraints. While responsibility might help specify what to distribute, it cannot tell us how to distribute; thus, Hurley argues, responsibility cannot tell us to distribute in an egalitarian pattern in particular. It can, however, play other important roles in a theory of justice, in relation to incentive-seeking behavior and well-being. Hurley's book proposes a new, bias-neutralizing approach to distributive justice that places responsibility in these less problematic roles. http://rapidshare.com/files/223475245/__27491___20041___12289___24184___31119___21644___30693___35782_.pdf.html [ Last edited by 梅若鸣 on 2009-6-18 at 07:53 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平”
已经有6人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有16人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有13人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有6人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有10人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复
简单回复
疏影25352楼
2009-04-20 17:17
回复
