| 查看: 220 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价1次，作者听不进增加金币 0.5 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
【分享】正义、幸福和知识【已搜无重复】
|
||
|
The recent past has seen striking advances in our understanding of both moral responsibility and distributive justice. S. L. Hurley's ambitious work brings these two areas of lively debate into overdue contact with each other. Key contemporary discussions of distributive justice have formulated egalitarian approaches in terms of responsibility; in this view, the aim of egalitarianism is to respect differences between positions for which people are responsible while neutralizing differences that are a matter of luck. But this approach, Hurley contends, has ignored the way our understanding of responsibility constrains the roles it can actually play within distributive justice. Her book brings the new articulation of responsibility to bear in explaining these constraints. While responsibility might help specify what to distribute, it cannot tell us how to distribute; thus, Hurley argues, responsibility cannot tell us to distribute in an egalitarian pattern in particular. It can, however, play other important roles in a theory of justice, in relation to incentive-seeking behavior and well-being. Hurley's book proposes a new, bias-neutralizing approach to distributive justice that places responsibility in these less problematic roles. http://rapidshare.com/files/223475245/__27491___20041___12289___24184___31119___21644___30693___35782_.pdf.html [ Last edited by 梅若鸣 on 2009-6-18 at 07:53 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有18人回复
-
退学或坚持读
已经有25人回复
-
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有4人回复
-
免疫学博士有名额，速联系
已经有14人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有4人回复
-
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
简单回复
疏影25352楼
2009-04-20 17:17
回复
