| 查看: 2926 | 回复: 6 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
修改稿回复后，副主编决定信给了为何还要送审？？ 已有3人参与
|
||
|
Dear Prof. Dr. *: We are returning your manuscript "Unidirectional propagation of***", JAP18-AR-03991R, for minor improvements in Figs. 4-6 and the associated discussion. The scale bar in Figs. 4 and 6 presumably refers to the amplitude of the electric field, and should be labeled as such in the caption. The "max" and "min" of the scale bars would then be explained. At the moment it is not clear whether "max" and "min" refer to field or intensity. Also, "light energy" is presumably intensity? Finally, make sure that the labels in these figures use a font that is large enough so the labels will remain readable when they are reduced for publication. When these changes are implemented, we will continue the publication process. When you respond, please indicate how the manuscript has been revised in your response letter so that the editors can see whether you have complied with the reviewer comments. The revised manuscript should be returned to the Editor promptly. Your revised manuscript is due 20-Nov-2018. A manuscript returned after 20-Nov-2018 will generally be regarded as new submission and will be assigned a new receipt date. 副主编决定信给了When these changes are implemented, we will continue the publication process Stage Start Date Reviewer Assignment Started 29-Oct-2018 11:47:20 Securing Associate Editor 29-Oct-2018 11:47:19 Securing Editor 29-Oct-2018 11:47:19 Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed 29-Oct-2018 11:47:19 Manuscript File Replaced 26-Oct-2018 11:29:18 Submission Check by Editorial Office Started 25-Oct-2018 10:33:07 Securing Editor 25-Oct-2018 10:33:07 Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 25-Oct-2018 10:33:05 Waiting for File Conversion 25-Oct-2018 10:14:39 Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 25-Oct-2018 10:02:05 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2025年遐想
已经有5人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有12人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
|
Reviewer #1 (REMARKS to AUTHOR(s)): Since the authors have considered my comments to revise the manuscript. I would like to recommand the publication in JAP . Reviewer #2 (REMARKS to AUTHOR(s)): I have read carefully the response letter and the revised article and I have no other remarks. The authors have thoroughly considered all my remarks. I am now convinced that the paper is suitable for JAP. 两个审稿人都同意发表，副主编提了一点图的问题和单词问题，怎么又送审呢？ |
3楼2018-10-31 16:26:51