| 查看: 1826 | 回复: 5 | ||||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者zhou-321将赠送您 16 个金币 | ||||
[求助]
各位虫友帮忙看看审稿意见,指点迷津。 已有1人参与
|
||||
|
第一次投稿,审稿意见下来的,看了半天,不明白啥意思,以下是审稿意见,问题主要是前半段看着不明白,各位虫友帮帮忙,谢谢。 The reviewer(s) and editor have evaluated your manuscript "**********" As you will see from the comments below and on ************, moderate revision has been requested. Given that the requested revisions are moderate the new version is required within Nov 13, 2018. To submit a revision, go to ************* and log in as an Author. You will find your submission record under Submission(s) Needing Revision. Please note that resubmissions not received within Nov 13, 2018 may be withdrawn, unless you contact me to extend the deadline. With your resubmission, explain how and where each point of the reviewer's comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked" . Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. To facilitate further review, add line numbers to the text of your manuscript. Please present any figures, tables etc. as separate files. See the Artwork Guidelines on the home page right menu for further file naming conventions, referencing and format issues. Please upload source files (e.g. Word or LaTeX) of the text and figures. PDF files of the text cannot be handled by the typesetters. Please strictly follow the formatting requirements as presented in the Guide for Authors at ***********. As regards the figures: The cost for colour printing should be met by the author. In order to reduce the cost you may choose to redraw those figures where colour can be substituted by using different graphical shapes. I hope that you will find these comments to be of use to you and am looking forward to receiving your revision. Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. PLEASE NOTE: Materials Letters would like to enrich online articles by displaying interactive figures that help the reader to visualize and explore your research results. For this purpose, we would like to invite you to upload figures in the MATLAB .FIG file format as supplementary material to our online submission system. Elsevier will generate interactive figures from these files and include them with the online article on SciVerseScienceDirect. If you wish, you can submit .FIG files along with your revised submission. Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect . If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation. Materials Letters features the Interactive Plot Viewer, see: https://www.elsevier.com/interactiveplots. Interactive Plots provide easy access to the data behind plots. To include one with your article, please prepare a .csv file with your plot data and test it online at https://authortools.elsevier.com ... ication before submission as supplementary material. Data in Brief (optional) We invite you to convert your supplementary data (or a part of it) into a Data in Brief article. Data in Brief articles are descriptions of the data and associated metadata which are normally buried in supplementary material. They are actively reviewed, curated, formatted, indexed, given a DOI and freely available to all upon publication. Data in Brief should be uploaded with your revised manuscript directly to Materials Letters. If your Materials Letters research article is accepted, your Data in Brief article will automatically be transferred over to our new, fully Open Access journal, Data in Brief, where it will be editorially reviewed and published as a separate data article upon acceptance. The Open Access fee for Data in Brief is $500. Please just fill in the template found here: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/ ... rief_template.docx. Then, place all Data in Brief files (whichever supplementary files you would like to include as well as your completed Data in Brief template) into a .zip file and upload this as a Data in Brief item alongside your Materials Letters revised manuscript. Note that only this Data in Brief item will be transferred over to Data in Brief, so ensure all of your relevant Data in Brief documents are zipped into a single file. Also, make sure you change references to supplementary material in your Materials Letters manuscript to reference the Data in Brief article where appropriate. Questions? Please send your inquiries to dib@elsevier.com. Example Data in Brief can be found here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/23523409 Kind regards, Aldo Boccaccini Editor-in-Chief Materials Letters Note: While submitting the revised manuscript, please double check the author names provided in the submission so that authorship related changes are made in the revision stage. If your manuscript is accepted, any authorship change will involve approval from co-authors and respective editor handling the submission and this may cause a significant delay in publishing your manuscript. .......................................................... Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments, those items will not be in this letter. Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided. COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS Reviewer #1: In recent years, environmental friendly renewable energy systems catch the eyes of many researchers. However, they only focus on the performance of new energy systems and ignore the waste produced during manufacturing. The author did a great job to recycle and reuse silicon kerf waste to prepare porous silicon/mullite ceramics with complex microstructure. If this waste is recycled and reutilized, it will not only reduce solid waste pollution problem but also greatly lower the cost of silicon wafers. It is a very good idea. It will be better if the author can compare the costs of traditional recycling processes to their new reuse processes. 小弟疑惑的是前面一大段,我需要注意啥,有点蒙蔽,还有针对这个意见,需不需要补实验,做个比较的话,是不是需要列个表就行。 |
» 猜你喜欢
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生
已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士
已经有5人回复
求助院士们,这个如何合成呀
已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有9人回复
想换工作。大多数高校都是 评职称时 认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗?
已经有7人回复
需要合成515-64-0,50g,能接单的留言
已经有4人回复
自荐读博
已经有4人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文,论文内容以实验为主,投什么期刊合适?
已经有6人回复
带资进组求博导收留
已经有10人回复
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有11人回复

nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-

专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555220
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
zhou-321(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2018-10-15 12:23:33
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
zhou-321(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2018-10-15 12:23:33
|
需要你关注的是最后的一段: COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS Reviewer #1: In recent years, environmental friendly renewable energy systems catch the eyes of many researchers. However, they only focus on the performance of new energy systems and ignore the waste produced during manufacturing. The author did a great job to recycle and reuse silicon kerf waste to prepare porous silicon/mullite ceramics with complex microstructure. If this waste is recycled and reutilized, it will not only reduce solid waste pollution problem but also greatly lower the cost of silicon wafers. It is a very good idea. It will be better if the author can compare the costs of traditional recycling processes to their new reuse processes. 以及 the new version is required within Nov 13, 2018. |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
2楼2018-10-15 10:24:16
★ ★
zhou-321(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2018-10-15 12:23:38
zhou-321(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2018-10-15 12:23:38
|
论文小修,前半段就是编辑要求修改后的稿件在Nov.13,2018前要重新返回去,如果需要延长就给编辑发邮件说你延长时间到什么时候提交。需不需要补实验你要看reviewer的意见逐条回复。而且文章修改的部分在revision manuscript里面要标记出来。如果你觉得审稿人提的某条意见不对,你可以申诉。后面就说的按人家要求的格式弄。reviewer1的意思就是让你计算比较你的制备方法和传统的制备流程的成本比较,需要提供具体的计算过程。reviewer意思基本就是accept我觉得,只不过需要你最好提供成本分析 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
3楼2018-10-15 10:29:36

4楼2018-10-15 10:55:57

5楼2018-10-15 10:56:24
6楼2018-10-15 10:59:17







. Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. To facilitate further review, add line numbers to the text of your manuscript.
回复此楼
zhou-321