[交流] 唉，文章退稿了

Originally posted by 努力着 at 2009-4-8 08:22:
苦苦等了半年，居然就被第三个人给退了！
大家有什么建议吗？？
--------------------------
Reviewer #3: 1. Because the authors include a feasibility and security analysis in section 3, thus the reviewer suggests the section 3 should rename into " 3. Discussions".
2. In spite of the authors showed a comparison of the computational cost among Tzeng's protocol (2002 is too old) and Huang et al.'s protocol in Table 2, if the authors can add another recent schemes in table 2, they will be appreciated. In addition, the comparison should include the "communication cost"based on the common mechanism. Otherwise; the contribution is not significant in current state.
3. The security analysis is roughly. In fact, the authors should list the proposed scheme can withstand several attacks (such as DoS, forgery, replay, man-in-the-middle attacks, forward secrecy etc. security issues) item by item to illustrate your contributions. Finally, the reviewer also suggests making a comparison among recent schemes.
------------------
第三个审稿人也没有让退稿啊，而且明显不是前两个审稿人的要求。就这种情况居然也退稿。我也不知道怎么办了。我给主编写了信，到现在也没有回复。
------------------