| 查看: 682 | 回复: 0 | ||
[求助]
跪求这篇英文摘要的中文啊！！感激不尽！！
|
|
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Aug 7;101:244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.035. [Epub ahead of print] A pooled analysis of published, basket trials in cancer medicine. Hazim A1, Prasad V2. Author information Abstract BACKGROUND: There is widespread interest in cancer basket trials. However, to date, there has been no formal analysis of all published basket trials. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify all published basket trials in cancer medicine. We included studies that (1) did not place restriction on tumour type and (2) used a biomarker for the basis of enrolment (3) administered at least one anti-cancer agent in prospective fashion and (4) reported responses by each tumour type included. We sought information regarding the tumour histology included and the response rate in basket trials. In addition, we used national cancer statistics to identify which tumour types have been overrepresented in basket studies (i.e. more representation in trials than their incidence would suggest) and those which are under-represented. RESULTS: We identified eight articles with a combined enrolment of 1176 patients were included in our analysis, representing over 33 tumour types. Ovarian and fallopian tube cancers 221/1176 (19%), colorectal cancer 144/1176 (12%) and sarcoma 129 (11%) were the most common tumours represented, whereas renal cell cancer, seminoma, thymic carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumour and appendiceal carcinoma were the least represented with one case each. The overall response rate was 25%. Common cancers may be underrepresented compared with rarer tumour types (linear regression beta = 0.58, 95% confidence interval = -0.037-1.21) (slope < 1 implies under-representation, >1 over-representation). CONCLUSIONS: We found that, to date, over 1100 patients have been enrolled on published basket studies. Common cancers may be underrepresented compared with rarer tumours. The overall response rate was 25%. Patients enrolling on basket trials should be counselled appropriately that although these studies are highly promising, most patients did not respond. Future targets and drugs may improve on these results. Copyright ? 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. KEYWORDS: Basket trials; Genome driven oncology; Master protocols; Precision oncology; Tumor agnostic PMID: 30096705 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.035 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有13人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有10人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有13人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有8人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有17人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有19人回复
-
【博士招生】太原理工大学2026化工博士
已经有8人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有4人回复
