Your?Technical?Paper,?listed?above,?has?completed?a?review?for?publication?in?ASCE's?Journal?of?Performance?of?Constructed?Facilities. The?editor?has?requested?that?a?revised?manuscript?be?prepared?based?on?the?reviewers'?evaluations?(shown?at?the?end?of?this?email)?and?submitted?for?re-review?by?08-27-2018.
第一个专家最后意见:Based?on?all?these?comments,?the?reviewer?recommends?minor?revision?of?this?paper.?
第二个专家最后意见:Sometimes?only?observations?are?made?with?unreasonable?explanation.?
My?general?impression?of?the?paper?is?that?it?lacks?originality?as?the?laboratory?tests?are?common,?and?the?results?and?causes?are?expectable.?
In?this?case,?the?paper?shoube?be?rejected.
第三个审稿人最后意见:
This?reviewer?has?provided?numerous?comments?and?suggestions?for?improving?the?manuscript?(attached).?It?is?suggested?that?the?manuscript?be?reworded,?or?revised,?in?several?areas,?as?noted.
最后让revise后再review，希望大吗？意见还不少，请问各位大神怎么修改，不吝传授经验。谢谢啦！
![ASCE's?Journal?of?Performance?of?Constructed?Facilities审稿意见回来了]()
发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼
+2/430