| 查看: 1202 | 回复: 3 | ||||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者weibinbin将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||||
weibinbin银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
electrochemistry communicaitions返修稿求助 已有2人参与
|
|||
| 哪位大神之前发过electrochemistry communicaitions，能否给我发一下针对审稿人意见回复的模板，我回复之后，编辑发邮件说For the file of your response to the comments of the referees, please provide the information as clearly requested in the decision letter.邮箱：weibb19900820@163.com，不胜感激！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
北京211副教授，35岁，想重新出发，去国外做博后，怎么样？
已经有9人回复
-
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345462
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127553
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
审稿回复的格式是点对点，一问一答，楼主可以参考以下模板： List of Responses Dear Editor and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× ...... 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用： We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that…… We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that…… Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have …… 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见： Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: ×××××× Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………” 2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ×××××× We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. |
2楼2018-06-28 22:58:27
weibinbin
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 74.7
- 散金: 125
- 帖子: 52
- 在线: 105.4小时
- 虫号: 3369776
- 注册: 2014-08-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学
3楼2018-06-28 23:18:19
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555220
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2018-06-28 23:32:30