| ²é¿´: 737 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
ÎïÀíСÍõ×Óгæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
Õâ¶Î¹ØÓÚ»»ÈȵÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûɶÒâ˼Âð£¿
|
|
ÇóÖ¸µãÃÔ½ò£¬½üÈÕͶÁËһƪ¹ØÓÚ»»ÈÈÆ÷µÄÎÄÕ¡£ÎÄÖÐÓÐÒ»ÕÅͼÊÇFig.8 ѹ½µËæÀ×ŵÊý±ä»¯¹ØÏµÍ¼¡£Éó¸åÈ˸øÁËÈçÏÂÒâ¼û£º Although there is a scalar of performance presented at the end of the manuscript, the data as presented needs to be scaled by the area to volume ratio to remove this parameter from the discussion. It is about heat exchange after all. The role of mixing and artefacts of the flow can then be better discerned. It is always difficult to determine the independent variable in a system such as presented but the data scaled by area to volume ratio at constant or near constant inlet Reynolds number would help the comparison. The area to volume ratio is quite different between the traditional and novel cases. I would recommend that Figure 8 and those that follow consider this option. ²»ÊǺÜÄÜÀí½âʲôÒâ˼£¬ÊÇÈÃÎÒ°ÑÃæ»ý/Ìå»ý¶Ôѹ½µ¶Ôѹ½µµÄÓ°Ï쿼ÂǽøÈ¥Âð£¿ÒªÎÒÓÃRe¡¤V/S×÷ºá×ø±ê£¿»¹ÊÇÓá÷P¡¤S/V×÷×Ý×ø±ê£¿ÓÐÈËÖªµÀÀàËÆµÄ´¦Àí»òÕßÎÄÏ×Â𣿶àл |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£©
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ085601
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
»·¾³×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
22408 µ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
phiphi325
Ìú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 365.5
- Ìû×Ó: 110
- ÔÚÏß: 21.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 515238
- ×¢²á: 2008-03-01
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§·´Ó¦¹¤³Ì
2Â¥2018-07-08 15:34:39














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥