24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2411)
>导师招生 (819)
>虫友互识 (450)
>休闲灌水 (397)
>招聘信息布告栏 (129)
>论文投稿 (99)
>博后之家 (79)
>文献求助 (63)
>硕博家园 (42)
>教师之家 (36)
>学术会议 (34)
>考研 (31)
>考博 (23)
>公派出国 (23)
>基金申请 (16)
>找工作 (12)

返回列表

maxworse

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
帖子: 2
在线: 45分钟
虫号: 2230255
注册: 2013-01-08

[交流] 这种情况下，我还能再投plosone 么？已有5人参与

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for review by PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our publication criteria and therefore must be rejected.

Specifically, during our initial internal evaluation of the manuscript, we found significant text overlap and re-use between your submission and the following previously published work(s) outside the Methods section:

https://www.ijbs.com/v13p1361.htm
https://www.pennstatehershey.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=ea3955dc-98cc-41fe-8797-29b575853231&groupId=101847
https://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/15/9/2187

PLOS ONE would like to make you aware that copying extracts from previous publications word-for-word is unacceptable. In addition, the reproduction of text from published reports may have implications for any copyright that applies to the publications.

While we understand that some text overlap and re-use may be unavoidable in the Methods section, we require that any overlap is minimized in the Introduction, Results, and Discussion sections. Text from overlapping sources must be cited, quoted, or rephrased as is appropriate.

In addition, the quality of the English language in your submission is not at an adequate standard for peer review. We recommend having your manuscript copy edited for language usage and grammar, for instance by a third party or a professional service.

I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but we hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely,
Vanessa Carels
Associate Editor
PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

回复此楼