| 查看: 544 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
大神们，有没有人帮我看看这两条外审意见如何回复啊 不甚感激！
|
|
Firstly, this article finishes a big job of homework of DEA technique in general; however, it does not propose enough novel information in the theoretical development of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Thus, there are not enough theoretical contribution exist in this manuscript. We suggest that author should explain the analytical mechanism in the DEA method in order to highlight the methodology contribution of the work. The empirical results cannot provide enough solid/valid bases to judge the pros and cons of the DEA method in the performance evaluation. Secondly, improper input-output setting is not valid to conduct a DEA model. The isotonicity analysis and the sensitivity analysis should also be conducted in order to improve the validity of DEA model. In this manuscript, author directly selects the five combinations of inputs and outputs variables and reveals that the screening mechanism of output/input variables is not enough robustness. Thus, the empirical results are not valid base on the incorrect variables assigned. And, the author needs to report the average within the evaluating years for each input/output item.  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
如果工作了想读博，可以边工作边读全日制嘛？
已经有6人回复
-
青B发送上会通知了吗
已经有9人回复
-
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有6人回复
-
论文撤稿了
已经有8人回复
-
博士申请
已经有7人回复
-
化学专业申博
已经有4人回复
-
评审有感
已经有27人回复
-
河北省自然科学基金
已经有9人回复
-
某211大学教师把个人教师官方主页改成:我跑了我跑了我跑了!官宣跑路！
已经有5人回复
-
26/27申博自荐
已经有9人回复
