| 查看: 558 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
大神们，有没有人帮我看看这两条外审意见如何回复啊 不甚感激！
|
|
Firstly, this article finishes a big job of homework of DEA technique in general; however, it does not propose enough novel information in the theoretical development of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Thus, there are not enough theoretical contribution exist in this manuscript. We suggest that author should explain the analytical mechanism in the DEA method in order to highlight the methodology contribution of the work. The empirical results cannot provide enough solid/valid bases to judge the pros and cons of the DEA method in the performance evaluation. Secondly, improper input-output setting is not valid to conduct a DEA model. The isotonicity analysis and the sensitivity analysis should also be conducted in order to improve the validity of DEA model. In this manuscript, author directly selects the five combinations of inputs and outputs variables and reveals that the screening mechanism of output/input variables is not enough robustness. Thus, the empirical results are not valid base on the incorrect variables assigned. And, the author needs to report the average within the evaluating years for each input/output item.  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有115人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有8人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有10人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有8人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有14人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有7人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有30人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有11人回复
-
快农历七夕节了，轻松一下，男人悄悄话，女施主请不要进来。
已经有7人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有6人回复
