| 查看: 8280 | 回复: 24 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wandousw将赠送您 12 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
AGU的杂志审稿三个月，返回substantial revisions，两个大修，求助！ 已有4人参与
|
|||
|
AGU旗下比较新的一个杂志，不是很知名，环境方向的，现在返回意见substantial revisions：超大修，真是很绝望啊。 两个审稿人都是给的大修，意见超多……评价比较负面，编辑只给了两周修改，这种情况怎么办呀，还有必要改吗…… 编辑的decision letter： I have received 2 reviews of your manuscript, which are included below and/or attached. As you can see, the reviews indicate that substantial revisions are needed before your paper can be accepted. I am therefore returning the paper to you so that you can make the necessary changes. 附部分评价： Recommendation: Return to author for major revisions Significant (Required): There are major errors or gaps in the paper but it could still become significant with major changes, revisions, and/or additional data. Supported (Required): Mostly yes, but some further information and/or data are needed. Referencing (Required): Yes Quality (Required): The organization of the manuscript and presentation of the data and results need some improvement. Data (Required): Yes Accurate Key Points (Required): Yes Recommendation: Return to author for major revisions Significant (Required): The paper has some unclear or incomplete reasoning but will likely be a significant contribution with revision and clarification. Supported (Required): Mostly yes, but some further information and/or data are needed. Referencing (Required): Mostly yes, but some additions are necessary. Quality (Required): The organization of the manuscript and presentation of the data and results need some improvement. Data (Required): Yes Accurate Key Points (Required): Yes |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有16人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
903279943
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2165.4
- 散金: 4634
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 1731
- 在线: 382.3小时
- 虫号: 1488805
- 注册: 2011-11-12
- 专业: 环境地球化学
★ ★
wandousw: 回帖置顶 2018-05-06 14:11:42
lotuscsx: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2018-05-07 08:42:18
wandousw: 回帖置顶 2018-05-06 14:11:42
lotuscsx: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2018-05-07 08:42:18
|
绝对不是你说的这样。我投的两篇AGU旗下期刊都是大修，只要认真改，都会接收。AGU旗下期刊的Editor都很nice。另外，虽然AGU旗下期刊影响因子不高，但其文章质量很过硬，超过ACS。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
6楼2018-05-05 22:29:01
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2018-05-05 14:46:01
3楼2018-05-05 15:23:39
zhaokanbing
木虫之王 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 141 (高中生)
- 金币: 108843
- 散金: 217
- 红花: 135
- 帖子: 10088
- 在线: 2968.6小时
- 虫号: 1866990
- 注册: 2012-06-22
- 专业: 多相流热物理学
4楼2018-05-05 15:48:12