24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wandousw将赠送您 12 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wandousw

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 155.5
帖子: 12
在线: 6.7小时
虫号: 2333215
注册: 2013-03-09
专业: 环境污染化学

[求助] AGU的杂志审稿三个月，返回substantial revisions，两个大修，求助！已有4人参与

AGU旗下比较新的一个杂志，不是很知名，环境方向的，现在返回意见substantial revisions：超大修，真是很绝望啊。
两个审稿人都是给的大修，意见超多……评价比较负面，编辑只给了两周修改，这种情况怎么办呀，还有必要改吗……
编辑的decision letter：
I have received 2 reviews of your manuscript, which are included below and/or attached. As you can see, the reviews indicate that substantial revisions are needed before your paper can be accepted. I am therefore returning the paper to you so that you can make the necessary changes.

附部分评价：
Recommendation: Return to author for major revisions
Significant (Required): There are major errors or gaps in the paper but it could still become significant with major changes, revisions, and/or additional data.
Supported (Required): Mostly yes, but some further information and/or data are needed.
Referencing (Required): Yes
Quality (Required): The organization of the manuscript and presentation of the data and results need some improvement.
Data (Required): Yes
Accurate Key Points (Required): Yes

Recommendation: Return to author for major revisions
Significant (Required): The paper has some unclear or incomplete reasoning but will likely be a significant contribution with revision and clarification.
Supported (Required): Mostly yes, but some further information and/or data are needed.
Referencing (Required): Mostly yes, but some additions are necessary.
Quality (Required): The organization of the manuscript and presentation of the data and results need some improvement.
Data (Required): Yes
Accurate Key Points (Required): Yes

回复此楼