24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4756)
>文献求助 (348)
>论文投稿 (299)
>导师招生 (292)
>博后之家 (253)
>虫友互识 (182)
>硕博家园 (100)
>考博 (93)
>有机交流 (81)
>招聘信息布告栏 (73)
>学术会议 (57)
>休闲灌水 (38)
>基金申请 (31)
>教师之家 (26)
>找工作 (25)
>考研 (25)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

elenlittle

金虫 (小有名气)

PC-EPI: 2
应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 7.7
帖子: 187
在线: 150.7小时
虫号: 590580

[交流] Angew审稿两正一负，要申诉否？

四月二号投稿一篇Angew，隔了一天编辑回复说缩短20%篇幅，七号重投后under review，五月二号收到意见，两正一负，其中负面评价的审稿人只有几行字，说新意不够，关键是看起来他没有仔细读文章，提的意见是错的，我们准备申诉，各位虫友帮忙看一下出出主意。

REVIEWER REPORT

EVALUATION:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

1. Please rate the importance of the reported results

Reviewer #1: Highly important (top 20%)

Reviewer #2: Highly important (top 20%)

Reviewer #3: Too specialized

2. Please rate the citation of previous publications

Reviewer #1: Appropriate

Reviewer #2: Appropriate

Reviewer #3: Insufficient

3. Please rate the length of the manuscript

Reviewer #1: Concise

Reviewer #2: Concise

Reviewer #3: Concise

4. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data

Reviewer #1: Fully consistent

Reviewer #2: Minor inconsistencies

Reviewer #3: Minor inconsistencies

5. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3:
*Chemistry—An Asian Journal

————————————————————————————————————————
后来我们决定申诉，花了两周补实验数据，发信给编辑，编辑回复任何人都有申诉的权利，建议以new submission的形式投稿，等了35天收到接收的邮件。谢谢各位！

Dear Dr. Li,

Thank you for your submission of 24 May 2018. We sent the paper back to the referees and they are satisfied with the changes made. Accordingly, we are pleased to inform you that the revised version of the above-mentioned manuscript has now been accepted for publication in Angewandte Chemie.

[ Last edited by elenlittle on 2018-6-28 at 10:22 ]

回复此楼