| 查看: 674 | 回复: 0 | ||
[求助]
年前投稿RSC Advances，审稿意见有一点不知道该如何回答，急求。
|
| 年前投稿RSC Advances，审稿意见有一点不知道该如何回答， The authors should be aware of the difficulties of comparing the energies of the mechanisms of two reactions obtained with severe approximations. On the side of the non-enzymatic hydration/dehydration reaction, the employment implicit solvation models (even with the inclusion of 3 explicit water molecules) might be problematic. But it is even worse in the case of the heme-catalyzed reaction: the lack of the rest of the enzyme will probably affect to the results in a great extents. Therefore, although I consider that the results might still be publishable (mainly because it may inspire future works with more reliable methodologies, such as QM/MM simulations or QM dynamics) the authors should acknowledge these possible problems in the discussion. 急求，急求，急求。我打算在结论部分对文章的不足做一些描述，因为我的计算是根据别人做的一个实验来完成的，针对审稿人说的存在的问题，我也不知道该如何回答，不知道该怎么写。求提示。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
26申博推荐：南京航空航天大学国际前沿院光学方向招收博士生！
已经有1人回复
-
如何从铁电相到顺电相。
已经有1人回复
-
物理学I论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有86人回复
-
各位大佬，求一份最新Wien2k版本作为学习用途
已经有0人回复
-
南科大活性流体和软物质课题组诚招2027级博士、硕士研究生和博后
已经有38人回复
-
瑞典林雪平大学博士后招聘｜PEC Water Splitting 方向
已经有24人回复
-
PRB投稿，Acknowledgment sent to author状态十天了
已经有3人回复
-
PVA溶解
已经有1人回复
-
基金申请
已经有44人回复