24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tylers

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 29.5
帖子: 11
在线: 9.1小时
虫号: 7314003

[交流] IEEE ACCESS这样的审稿意见重投还有希望吗

各位大佬看下这个审稿意见，重投有希望吗 IEEE ACCESS的稿件
I have been able to get review comments from three independent reviewers. As you will see, all the three reviewers raise the similar concern on the issue of computational complexity comparison. Furthermore, Reviewer 1 questions the novel contributions of the paper, which need to be better demonstrated. In view of the criticisms of the reviewers found at the bottom of this letter and based on my own reading, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access in the current form.
We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your paper once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, we need to reject an article even if it requires minor revisions.
Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript.
主要是第一个审稿人的意见比较尖锐。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2017-12-26 21:14:51

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

图像猫

新虫 (知名作家)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 676.6
帖子: 5441
在线: 852.3小时
虫号: 4356976

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

25楼: Originally posted by Acct_宣 at 2018-05-24 17:17:23
您好，请问一下，我的论文4个审稿人，拒绝后编辑让修改后重投，编辑最后说：
Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers ...

如果理由合适，你可以要求换一个呀。至于最后编辑换几个，我也不知。

发自小木虫IOS客户端