| 查看: 571 | 回复: 1 | ||
hl89119924至尊木虫 (职业作家)
123
|
[求助]
微晶玻璃方面审稿意见求助
|
|
各位虫子好,本人上次投了一篇玻璃陶瓷的论文,审稿人给出了一个审稿意见,实在看不懂,就按自己理解的意思改了下,审稿意见如下: Reviewer #2: The work of "synthesis, structure and properties of MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-B2O3 transparent glass-ceramics" is mostly experimental in nature and devoted to the study of glass-ceramic systems based on oxides of silicon and boron. In the study of work, I would highlight the following drawback. The absence of a fundamental theory. Experimental data confirming the properties of the system under study is given in full. However, the study of ceramics-forming systems containing two or more stekloobrazovaniya requires serious theoretical justification. The authors can be published, however, I'd recommend adding a theoretical justification tracked in spectroscopy patterns for the studied system. Moreover, all of them basically fit into the concept of a Stanworth(Homopolar connection concept). 按照审稿意见本人添加了好多理论部分,然后审稿人审完后又返回来一个让人看不懂的意见,如下: Reviewer #2: Recommend that the authors mention in the article the minimum theoretical rationale for the observed experimental regularities in the studied amorphous matrix. 这个实在不知道怎么改了,投稿加修改都折腾了半年了,有没有做玻璃陶瓷方面的虫友帮忙看看审稿人到底是几个意思,谢谢了。 |
» 猜你喜欢
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有20人回复
有70后还继续奋斗在职场上的吗?
已经有4人回复
退学或坚持读
已经有25人回复
博士延得我,科研能力直往上蹿
已经有4人回复
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有4人回复
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
dlf_1990
银虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 65.7
- 散金: 319
- 帖子: 37
- 在线: 77.1小时
- 虫号: 1426251
- 注册: 2011-10-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 玻璃材料

2楼2017-12-13 23:28:23













回复此楼