24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2423)
>虫友互识 (207)
>文献求助 (51)
>硕博家园 (39)
>论文投稿 (34)
>休闲灌水 (32)
>导师招生 (30)
>基金申请 (29)
>教师之家 (21)
>公派出国 (18)
>考博 (17)
>考研 (17)
>论文道贺祈福 (14)
>博后之家 (11)
>海外博后 (6)
>找工作 (6)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zyh910303

铁虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 10.4
帖子: 162
在线: 125.9小时
虫号: 4167198

[交流] 前辈们帮我分析分析

投了MDPI一个期刊的special issue，一审50天，两个审稿人，一个建议小修后接受，但是给了很多修改意见；另一个也给了很多意见，没说接受还是拒稿，总体感觉意见不怎么积极，感觉两个审稿人都很很专业。学术编辑给了大修，十天时间，回复写了13页，第十天按时提交修改稿，当天状态变为revised version review；过了五天，学术编辑又给了小修，只有第二个审稿人给了意见，给了三天时间修改，按时提交修改稿后当天状态变为pending editor decision，期间等了十天，第十一天学术编辑又给了小修，给了四天时间修改，但是学术编辑给了整整两页comments，懵逼了。Comments开头说：Thank you again for your resubmission of *****‐-*****. The topic of the manuscript fits well with the special issue and many of the results are very relevant to the central questions. However, the methods and results do not provide the level of detailed needed to fully support the discussion and conclusions of the study. Therefore we request that for us to consider the article for publication that the following critical issues be addressed。一共有8段comments，平均每段大概6行。最后还写了这么一句：Again, I apologize for the length of my comments but I please know that I am trying to bring out the best parts of the paper and want to be as helpful as possible. 感觉情况不妙，心里很忐忑，第一篇sci，就这些金币，全散了。

回复此楼