24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3765  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hl89119924

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

123

[求助] 论文投稿求助已有3人参与

各位虫子好,本人上次投了一篇玻璃陶瓷的论文,审稿人给出了一个审稿意见,实在看不懂,就按自己理解的意思改了下,审稿意见如下:
Reviewer #2: The work of "synthesis, structure and properties of MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-B2O3 transparent glass-ceramics" is mostly experimental in nature and devoted to the study of glass-ceramic systems based on oxides of silicon and boron.
In the study of work, I would highlight the following drawback. The absence of a fundamental theory. Experimental data confirming the properties of the system under study is given in full. However, the study of ceramics-forming systems containing two or more stekloobrazovaniya requires serious theoretical justification. The authors can be published, however, I'd recommend adding a theoretical justification tracked in spectroscopy patterns for the studied system. Moreover, all of them basically fit into the concept of a Stanworth(Homopolar connection concept).

按照审稿意见本人添加了好多理论部分,然后审稿人审完后又返回来一个让人看不懂的意见,如下:
Reviewer #2: Recommend that the authors mention in the article the minimum theoretical rationale for the observed experimental regularities in the studied amorphous matrix.

这个实在不知道怎么改了,投稿加修改都折腾了半年了,有没有做玻璃陶瓷方面的虫友帮忙看看审稿人到底是几个意思,谢谢了。
(或者说可以给编辑写信让审稿人把审稿意见给具体些?不知道这样会不会给直接据稿了
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hl89119924

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

123

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by peterflyer at 2017-12-09 17:00:00
感觉审稿人嫌楼主罗列的理论太多了。用最少的基础理论将观察到的试验规律阐述清楚即可。

嗯嗯  谢谢了

发自小木虫Android客户端
11楼2017-12-10 09:16:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

liucao1234

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

十年杀猪

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-12-09 13:51:48
hl89119924: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2017-12-11 12:16:24
建议作者为文中所研究的非晶基质的的实验规律提供最基础的理论合理性。
Ratherthanlove,thanmoney,thanfaith,thanfame,thanfairness,givemethetruth.
2楼2017-12-09 12:16:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
hl89119924: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2017-12-11 12:16:35
让你找到合理的理论依据
不是哥不笑,一笑粉就掉
3楼2017-12-09 13:52:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hl89119924

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

123

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by liucao1234 at 2017-12-09 12:16:17
建议作者为文中所研究的非晶基质的的实验规律提供最基础的理论合理性。

是不是对文中所有非晶基质规律的变化给出合理的理论依据? 谢谢了

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2017-12-09 14:17:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见