24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hl89119924

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

123

应助: 14 (小学生)
金币: 15311.2
散金: 465
红花: 21
帖子: 3421
在线: 484.3小时
虫号: 2692057
注册: 2013-09-30
性别: GG
专业: 其他无机非金属材料

[求助] 论文投稿求助已有3人参与

各位虫子好，本人上次投了一篇玻璃陶瓷的论文，审稿人给出了一个审稿意见，实在看不懂，就按自己理解的意思改了下，审稿意见如下：
Reviewer #2: The work of "synthesis, structure and properties of MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-B2O3 transparent glass-ceramics" is mostly experimental in nature and devoted to the study of glass-ceramic systems based on oxides of silicon and boron.
In the study of work, I would highlight the following drawback. The absence of a fundamental theory. Experimental data confirming the properties of the system under study is given in full. However, the study of ceramics-forming systems containing two or more stekloobrazovaniya requires serious theoretical justification. The authors can be published, however, I'd recommend adding a theoretical justification tracked in spectroscopy patterns for the studied system. Moreover, all of them basically fit into the concept of a Stanworth(Homopolar connection concept).

按照审稿意见本人添加了好多理论部分，然后审稿人审完后又返回来一个让人看不懂的意见

，如下：
Reviewer #2: Recommend that the authors mention in the article the minimum theoretical rationale for the observed experimental regularities in the studied amorphous matrix.

这个实在不知道怎么改了，投稿加修改都折腾了半年了，有没有做玻璃陶瓷方面的虫友帮忙看看审稿人到底是几个意思，谢谢了。