| ²é¿´: 847 | »Ø¸´: 5 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
wanggc2939½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Elsevier³ö°æÉçÔÓÖ¾µÄÉó¸å³ÌÐò(ÖÐÓ¢»¥Òë°æ)
|
||
|
Elsevier³ö°æÉçÔÓÖ¾µÄÉó¸å³ÌÐò(ÖÐÓ¢»¥Òë°æ)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ¿ÉÄܶÔͶ¸åÐÂÊÖÓаïÖú£¡£¡ Peer Review Policy for Journals of Elsevier The practice of peer review is to ensure that good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing how(event)" class="t_tag">and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high sthow(event)" class="t_tag">andards how(event)" class="t_tag">and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. ͬÐÐÆÀÉóÖÆ¶È¿ÉÒÔÓÐЧµØ±£Ö¤ÔÓÖ¾·¢±íÎÄÕµĸßÖÊÁ¿£¬Æä´óÖ³ÌÐòÈçÏ£º Special issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, conference organisers or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office. ÔÓÖ¾±à¼²¿¶ÔÓÚ²»Í¬Àà±ðµÄ¸å¼þËùÐèÉó¸åÈË¿ÉÄÜ»áÓÐÆäÌØ¶¨µÄÒªÇó¡£ 1¡¢Initial manuscript evaluation The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review. µÚÒ»²½£º³õÉ󣺱༸ºÔð¡£Ö÷Òª¿¼²ì¸å¼þµÄ¿ÆÑÐˮƽ¡¢Ó¢ÓïµÄÓïÑÔˮƽÒÔ¼°ÊÇ·ñ·ûºÏÔÓÖ¾Ñо¿ÁìÓòµÄÒªÇ󡣺ÜÉÙÓиå¼þ»áÔÚÕâÒ»²½ÖèÀï¾ÍÖ±½Ó½ÓÊÕÁË¡£ Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt. ûÓÐͨ¹ý±à¼³õÉóµÄ¸å¼þ»áÔÚͶ¸åºó2ÖÜÄÚÊÕµ½¾Ü¸å֪ͨ¡£ 2¡¢Type of Peer Review Journal employs single blind review, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process. µÚ¶þ²½£ºÉó¸åÈËÉóÔÄ£º²ÉÓÃÄäÃûÖÆ How the referee is selected Referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated; we welcome suggestions for referees from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used. ¸ù¾Ý¸å¼þµÄÑо¿·½Ïò£¬±à¼²¿»á´Óר¼Ò¿âÖÐÖ¸¶¨Éó¸åÈË£¬µ±È»×÷Õß×Ô¼ºÒ²¿ÉÒÔÖ¸¶¨£¬µ«ÊDZ༲¿Î´±Ø»á²ÉÄÉ¡£ 3¡¢Referee reports Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work µÚÈý²½£ºÉó¸åÒâ¼û£ºÉó¸åÈËÖ÷Òª´Ó¸å¼þµÄÔ´´ÐÔ¡¢ÊµÑéÉè¼ÆµÄºÏÀíÐÔ¡¢ÊÇ·ñ·ûºÏÂ×ÀíµÀµÂÒªÇó¡¢ÊµÑéÊý¾ÝµÄ¿ÉÐÅÐÔ¡¢ÒýÓÃǰÈ˹¤×÷µÄÕýÈ·ÐԵȷ½ÃæÈ«Ã濼²ìÆÀ¹À¸å¼þÖÊÁ¿ Referees are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process. Éó¸åÈ˲»¸ºÔðÐ޸ĸå¼þÖÐÓ¢ÎĵÄÊéдÎÊÌâ How long does the review process take? Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 2 months. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. All our referees sign a conflict of interest statement. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the initial referees within 2 weeks after receipt at the editorial office. Referees may request more than one revision of a manuscript. Ò»°ãÇé¿öÏÂÉó¸åÈËÐèÒª2¸öÔÂ×óÓÒµÄʱ¼äµÃ³öÉó¸åÒâ¼û¡£Èç¹ûÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÏà×󣬻òÕ߯äÖÐһλÉó¸åÈËÎÞ¹ÊÑÓÎóÉó¸å£¬Ôò»¹ÐèÁíÍâÖ¸¶¨ÐµÄÉó¸åÈËÖØÐÂÉóÔÄ»òÖٲᣠ4¡¢Final report A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees. µÚËIJ½£¬»ã×ÜÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÐγÉ×îÖÕ¾öÒé 5¡¢Editor's Decision is final Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. µÚÎå²½£º±à¼ÏÂ֪ͨÊǽÓÊÜ»¹ÊÇ... [ Last edited by wanggc2939 on 2009-2-26 at 08:10 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì281»¹Óе÷¼Á»ú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ũѧ0904 312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
11408¡£358Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúµ÷¼Á£¬¿çµ÷
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ïôó0856£¬306Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
269Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
366Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
flbwlx
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
µ¥Éí¼Ò×åÖ®¡°´ó×ܹܡ±
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.02
- ½ð±Ò: 7211.5
- É¢½ð: 100
- ºì»¨: 9
- ɳ·¢: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 3818
- ÔÚÏß: 156.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 530658
- ×¢²á: 2008-03-22
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå²ÄÁÏ
2Â¥2009-02-26 08:16:27
wanggc2939
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 43.2
- É¢½ð: 2278
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 1481
- ÔÚÏß: 238.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 650613
- ×¢²á: 2008-11-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »ù´¡ÎïÀíѧ
3Â¥2009-02-26 08:30:45
feiyulian
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 26 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 737.1
- É¢½ð: 119
- ºì»¨: 9
- Ìû×Ó: 1625
- ÔÚÏß: 498Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 722643
- ×¢²á: 2009-03-14
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§·´Ó¦¹¤³Ì
4Â¥2009-10-20 09:57:31
richfu
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2029.6
- Ìû×Ó: 224
- ÔÚÏß: 299.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 806753
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-10
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÓ¦Óü¼Êõ
5Â¥2009-10-20 11:50:34
hello_79
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 58.3
- Ìû×Ó: 23
- ÔÚÏß: 2.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 292070
- ×¢²á: 2006-10-29
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ò©Îﻯѧ
6Â¥2009-10-20 11:55:06













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥