| 查看: 397 | 回复: 0 | ||
小丸九新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
帮忙翻译文献中的几段,谢谢
|
|
2.2. Data extraction2. Methods 2.1. Literature search and study identi?cation We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies describing in vivo and in vitro e?ects of exposure to melamine. The search included all articles published for all years up to November 2016. Electronic searches were performed in Web of Science and PubMed using the following search criteria: “melamine OR (5-triazine and 6-triamine) OR s-triazine-6-triamine OR 6-triamino-s-triazine OR (triazine* and triamine) OR s-triazinetriamine OR s-triazine-triamine OR triamino-triazine OR triaminotriazine OR triaminotriazines OR triazine-triamine OR triazinetriamine OR cyanuramide OR cyanurictriamide OR cyanurotriamide OR cyanurotriamine OR cyanuro-triamineORisomelamineORisomelaminesOR108-78-1”(theCASregistry number for melamine). For inclusion, the studies had to be primary literature, in the English language, and assess e?ects of melamine exposure in vitro and in vivo (excluding renal toxicity). All titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion independently by two reviewers using the software DistillerSR? (Evidence Partners, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Evidence Partners, 2015)). DistillerSR is software that allows A.L. Bolden et al. Toxicology Letters 280 (2017) 181–189 182 for the identi?cation of relevant studies via systematic and consistent evaluation of studies, and automates the process of con?ict resolution. Con?icts or discrepancies were resolved by discussion between the two reviewers. Data extracted included author information, year of publication, endpoint(s) evaluated, information about the model used (e.g., cell line and species), concentrations/doses tested, exposure duration, age at exposure, and route of exposure. The data were inputted by one reviewer and then quality checked by a second reviewer. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
» 猜你喜欢
关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有3人回复
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率
已经有7人回复
好奇怪的filecode
已经有4人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复










回复此楼
100