24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 6632  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lth1116

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 审稿意见,好仔细啊,感觉都是语言问题,这些标记什么意思? 已有12人参与

第一篇SCI,知道自己英文水平有限,语法问题可能会比较多,其实是参考已发表论文写的,同样的东西同样的写法,确被打了好多标记。两个审稿人意见,其中一个审稿人直接在手稿上写的,写的很仔细,但是由于第一次看到这种审稿意见,不大明白,希望大家指点一下,1、三角形表示要加空格吗?2、空格标记是什么意思?3、高亮是表示表述不合适?4、画横线表示要删除重新组织语言?。

审稿人意见如下: 贴图是审稿人2给的部分手稿
Reviewer 1

  -
This paper seeks to use eddy current testing as a non-destructive testing technique for quantitatively evaluating the degradation in cast duplex stainless steels as a result of relatively low temperature thermal aging. Therefore the authors compared the eddy current testing as a function of aging time at 380C up to 9000 hours with room temperature Charpy impact testing and Vicker’s microhardness testing at the same times and temperature. They found that eddy current testing correlates well with both room temperature Charpy impact energy and Vicker’s microhardness – the latter in an inverse manner. This paper deserves eventual acceptance for publication, but there are a few suggested changes that should be implemented both to improve the readability and the conclusions of the paper.

1. In the introduction, more thoroughly discuss eddy current testing: the physics behind it; how it is implemented in service; etc. Many readers may not be familiar with this technique.

2. There are several grammar and proofreading errors that need to be corrected throughout the paper. Please go through and carefully correct these; get a second set of eyes to help with these mistakes. Often, it is the comma vs. semicolon usage, along with usage of run-on sentences (I understand English is a second language).

3. If possible, in the materials section, please tell how the material was cast (starting temperature, cooling rate, size of pipe that samples were cut from, etc.).

4. What is the volume fraction of ferrite as a function of aging time? There is evidence that ferrite content may change during aging even at these relatively low aging temperature and times. This may highlight why there is a difference in the rate of change in ferrite hardness and Charpy impact energy.


5. Can eddy current testing distinguish between spinodally decomposed regions and G-phase precipitates? The literature has shown that there is a multi-stage process in which G-phase precipitates on the alpha/ alpha-prime interface. This could also highlight the reason for the change in slope in both microhardness and impact energy from 0-~2000 hours and ~2000-9000 hours.
You actually mention this but never discuss why it is the case:
“Fig.8 shows the changes of amplitude and ferrite Vickers microhardness with aging time. The amplitude varies inversely to the behavior of ferrite microhardness. The change can be divided into two stages, the first stage range from 0 to 2000h aging time and second stage range from 2000h to 9000h. Microhardness increases rapidly in the first stage and then the rate of increase slows down in the second stage. However, the amplitude decreases rapidly at the beginning and then decreases gradually.”

6. Expansion of the discussion and conclusions in general would also be helpful. Try going into greater detail.




-Reviewer 2

  - This work is an attempt to correlate the mechanical property changes of thermally aged ferrite-austenite duplex SSs with eddy current measurements.  A centrifugally cast SSs was thermally aged and tested for Charpy impact energy, microhardness, and eddy current.  There appears to be good correlations between eddy current and Charpy impact energy, and eddy current and microhardness.  The technical content of the paper is of interest for the JNM readers.  However, the clarity of the paper needs to be improved.  There are some grammar mistakes and technically inaccuracies in the current manuscript. Also, it is highly desirable that the correlations obtained in this paper can be validated with additional data from literature or from the authors’ lab.  I'd recommend some changes before publication.  Specific comments and suggestions are provided in the attached PDF.
Have questions or need assistance?
For further assistance, please visit our Customer Support site. Here you can search for solutions on a range of topics, find answers to frequently asked questions, and learn more about EVISE® via interactive tutorials. You can also talk 24/5 to our customer support team by phone and 24/7 by live chat and email.

One or more files have been made available to you as part of this decision. You can access them by clicking on the link(s) below.

JNM_2017_1118_Original_V0-review.pdf

-------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. | Privacy Policy

Elsevier B.V., Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Reg. No. 33156677.

审稿意见,好仔细啊,感觉都是语言问题,这些标记什么意思?
审稿意见.JPG
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

calyx

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
感觉好多三角形是需要加空格

发自小木虫Android客户端
7楼2017-10-24 11:34:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 17 个回答

Math露珠

木虫 (知名作家)

2楼2017-10-24 11:15:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

龙力回川

新虫 (正式写手)

3楼2017-10-24 11:16:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wzg921014

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
改的好仔细啊,我咋遇不到这样的审稿,太负责了

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2017-10-24 11:22:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[公派出国] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 EZ67DG6CvcKL 2026-08-31 4/200 2026-09-01 01:30 by o3EMxHUAQDtS
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 EZ67DG6CvcKL 2026-08-31 4/200 2026-09-01 01:30 by o3EMxHUAQDtS
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +6 叶九微 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-31 23:54 by yudaoqian88
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[找工作] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 EZ67DG6CvcKL 2026-08-31 3/150 2026-08-31 22:23 by o3EMxHUAQDtS
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +17 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 19/950 2026-08-31 21:30 by xiangy672
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-31 14:40 by hahaboy
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见