| ²é¿´: 3761 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßecho¶Ìβ°Í½«ÔùËÍÄú 5 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
echo¶Ìβ°Íгæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Error barÎÊÌâ
|
|
|
¸÷λ³æÓѺã¬ÏëÇë½ÌÒ»¸ö¹ØÓÚerror barµÄÎÊÌâ¡£ ÎÒͶ³öÈ¥µÄһƪÎÄÕÂÖÐerror barÊÇÔÚSPSSÖÐ×öµÄ£¨Í¨¹ý'Display error bars'Ñ¡Ï£¬×î½üÊÕµ½Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¬ËûÖ¸³öÁ˹ØÓÚerror barµÄÎÊÌ⣬Ի°ÊÇÕâÑùµÄ¡°The standard errors plotted in the figures are misleadingly large likely because they do not take into account within-subject comparisons. Could the authors plot for example SEs based on rmANOVA, e.g. using SE of the difference score¡±¡£¾ÝÎÒËùÖª£¬Ò»°ãerror bar¿ÉÄÜÖ¸±ê×¼²î»ò±ê×¼Îó£¬ËùÒÔÎҲ²âÕâÀïËûµÄÒâ˼¿ÉÄÜÊÇ˵ÎÒµÄerror barÊÇ»ùÓÚ±ê×¼²î»µÄ£¬ÏëÈÃÎÒÓñê×¼ÎóÖ¸±ê»¡£Èç¹ûÊÇÕâÑùµÄ»°£¬ÎÒµÄÒÉ»óÊDZê×¼ÎóÊÇÈçºÎºÍËûËù˵µÄ"take into account within-subject comparisons"ÁªÏµÆðÀ´µÄ£¿»¹ÊÇ˵£¬ÎÒµÄÀí½â´íÁË¡£¿´ÁËһЩ×ÊÁÏ£¬ÒÀÈ»¶Ôerror barµÄÀí½â²»¹»Í¸³¹£¬»¹Íû´ó¼ÒÖ¸½Ì£¬·Ç³£¸Ðл~£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬0703»¯Ñ§305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
362Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
333Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶329 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¼ª´ó»¯Ñ§327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á 348·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
һ־Ը̫ÔÀí¹¤´óѧ¼ÆËã»ú¼¼Êõר˶348£¬Çóµ÷¼ÁÖ¸µ¼
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ¿¼ÑÐÇóµ÷¼Á×Ü·Ö280
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
10