| 查看: 24630 | 回复: 33 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
AAAI-2018审稿意见出来了,大家都什么情况呢? 已有18人参与
|
|||
| AAAI-2018的初审意见出来了,大家都什么情况呢? |
» 猜你喜欢
交叉科学部支持青年基金,对三无青椒是个机会吗?
已经有3人回复
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有5人回复
Fe3O4@SiO2合成
已经有6人回复
青年基金C终止
已经有4人回复
青椒八年已不青,大家都被折磨成啥样了?
已经有7人回复
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有10人回复
救命帖
已经有11人回复
招博士
已经有5人回复
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有4人回复
限项规定
已经有7人回复
lxc86739795
铜虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 186.9
- 帖子: 17
- 在线: 7.5小时
- 虫号: 2109654
- 注册: 2012-11-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
转一个搜到的08年的标准。 1. Trivial or wrong or known. Clearly below AAAI threshold, I assume no further discussion is needed. 2. A strong rejection. I will strongly argue for rejection. 3. A clear rejection. I vote and argue for rejection. 4. An OK paper, but not good enough. A rejection. I vote for rejecting it, although would not be upset if it were accepted. 5. Marginally below the acceptance threshold. I tend to vote for rejecting it, but having it in the program would not be that bad. 6. Marginally above the acceptance threshold. I tend to vote for accepting it, but leaving it out of the program would be no great loss. 7. Good paper, accept. I vote for acceptance, although would not be upset if it were rejected. 8. Top 50% of accepted AAAI papers, a very good paper, a clear accept. I vote and argue for acceptance. 9. Top 15% of accepted AAAI papers, an excellent paper, a strong accept. I will fight for acceptance. 10. Top 5% of accepted AAAI papers, a seminal paper for the ages. Clearly an outstanding paper. I assume no further discussion is needed. ![]() ![]() |
8楼2017-10-17 12:43:38
|
666 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
2楼2017-10-16 23:47:53
3楼2017-10-17 00:07:42
4楼2017-10-17 09:23:32













回复此楼