| 查看: 762 | 回复: 0 | |||
hongyz铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
氧自由基介导细菌的自杀行为
|
|
Contribution of reactive oxygen species to thymineless death in Escherichia coli Yuzhi Hong, Liping Li, Gan Luan, Karl Drlica, Xilin Zhao. Cotribution of reactive oxygen species to thymineless death in Escherichia coli. Nature Microbiology, doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0037-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-017-0037-y Nutrient starvation usually halts cell growth rather than causing death. Thymine starvation is exceptional, because it kills cells rapidly. This phenomenon, called thymineless death (TLD), underlies the action of several antibacterial, antimalarial, anticancer, and immunomodulatory agents. Many explanations for TLD have been advanced, with recent efforts focused on recombination proteins and replication origin (oriC) degradation. Because current proposals account for only part of TLD and because reactive oxygen species (ROS) are implicated in bacterial death due to other forms of harsh stress, we investigated the possible involvement of ROS in TLD. Here, we show that thymine starvation leads to accumulation of both single-stranded DNA regions and intracellular ROS, and interference with either event protects bacteria from double-stranded DNA breakage and TLD. Elevated levels of single-stranded DNA were necessary but insufficient for TLD, whereas reduction of ROS to background levels largely abolished TLD. We conclude that ROS contribute to TLD by converting single-stranded DNA lesions into double-stranded DNA breaks. Participation of ROS in the terminal phases of TLD provides a specific example of how ROS contribute to stress-mediated bacterial self-destruction. Blog for this paper. https://naturemicrobiologycommun ... e-bacterial-suicide The paper in Nature Microbiology is here: http://go.nature.com/2xaJxNY Involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in thymineless death evolved from Collins’ discovery that ROS commonly contribute to killing by a variety of diverse antibacterials. For many years we have been interested in how inhibitors of bacterial replication kill cells, and a contribution of ROS provided a new direction. We supported and extended Collins’ work with follow-up studies, but controversy arose when the Lewis and Imlay groups failed to repeat Collins’ initial observations. We were unconvinced by the challenges because the known concentration dependence of the major stressor (norfloxacin) could easily account for laboratory-to-laboratory differences. Moreover, follow-up work by Collins addressed the criticisms. We next asked whether non-antimicrobial lethal stress also leads to ROS-mediated self-destruction. An obvious study choice was thymineless death, since it also involves inhibition of DNA replication. Thymineless death was also interesting because the molecular events were not fully understood, even after 60 years of study. None of the existing explanations of thymineless death fully accounted for the rapid and severe lethality, which led Kuzminov to suggest that a key component was missing from the death pathway arising from thymine starvation. We identified ROS as the missing and probably the crucial component, since thymineless death was completely abolished when ROS was kept at background levels. An interesting outcome was that DNA repair creates a more vulnerable substrate for ROS attack (persistent single-stranded DNA regions). In essence, two pathways join to give the lethal lesion (double-stranded DNA breaks). Since an ultrasensitive substrate for lethal ROS attack is created, very high levels of ROS are not required to kill cells; thus, Imlay’s speculation that endogenous levels of ROS are insufficient to kill bacteria can be readily explained. We have also used ROS involvement in cell death to address the quinolone paradox, a phenomenon in which very high concentrations fail to kill cells even though moderate concentrations are highly lethal. At high concentrations of nalidixic acid, ROS fail to accumulate, even though lesions created by the drug persist and are readily attacked by exogenous peroxide. One expectation of a death pathway involving ROS is that it can be blocked by anti-oxidant treatment after removal of the stressor -- bacteria thought to have been killed by the primary stressor can be resuscitated by addition of an ROS scavenger to agar used for post-stress viability determination. We found this to be the case with several lethal stressors. A key point is that ROS accumulation is the cause of death, not the result of it (had ROS been the consequence of cell death, addition of ROS scavenger to agar would have no effect on bacterial survival). Moreover, these data suggest that ROS-mediated post-stress self-destruction accounts for ROS contributing to the lethality of diverse stressors. The existence of an active death pathway in single-cell organisms raises evolutionary questions regarding the selective advantage of suicide following severe stress. Self-destruction also suggests new ways to control bacterial populations if small-molecule adjuvants are found that stimulate ROS accumulation during antimicrobial treatment. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有11人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
20