24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者tju_minifish将赠送您 10 个金币

tju_minifish

铜虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 93
帖子: 6
在线: 12.2小时
虫号: 3583088
注册: 2014-12-08
性别: MM
专业: 金属材料的力学行为

[求助] 编辑意见为resubmission？？给了几篇文献让三天内重新提交系统已有4人参与

编辑上午回复一封，下午又回复一封，如下。请大家帮忙看看这到底是什么意思？我对照了一下格式确实没有问题啊，主要是语言问题吗？感觉第一封是套话，其实是婉拒的意思？下午却又莫名其妙的来了一封，给了三篇文献让看？这是要拒稿的节奏吗？重新提交时需要给编辑回信说明修改吗？着急，在线等！！！
（一）
On 9/5/2017 10:18 AM, Celina Zou wrote:
> Dear Dr. Liu,
>
> Thank you very much for submitting the following manuscript:
>
Unfortunately, we have decided that the article requires improvement
> before it can be considered for peer review.
>
> Please ensure also that the manuscript has been submitted using the
> correct template. Guidelines, along with Word and LaTeX templates can
> be found on the 'Instructions for Authors' page at
> https://www.mdpi.com/journal/metals/instructions/.
>
> We would like to remind you that the journal charges article
> processing charges (APC) for accepted papers. Please do not resubmit
>  your paper to this journal unless you have carefully prepared it
> according to the 'Instructions for Authors' of the journal and have
> found a source of funds to cover the APC. As Metals is an open access
> journal, after publication the full text can be accessed free of
> charge from the journal website.
>
> If the editors have suggested that your manuscript should undergo
> English editing, please address this during revision. We suggest that
> you have your manuscript checked by a native English speaking
> colleague or use a professional English editing service.
> Alternatively, MDPI provides an English editing service checking
> grammar, spelling, punctuation and some improvement of style where
> necessary for an additional charge (extensive re-writing is not
> included), see details at https://www.mdpi.com/authors/english.
>
> Once you have modified your manuscript, you may resubmit it at

（二）
Dear Dr. Liu,

I'm writing this letter to let you informed of the academic editor's
comments shown as below:

Paper is quasi-ready to go through the peer-review process. Howevers
some related works are missed. Fatigue and testing has recently change
some old views about effects disregarded in the past. For instance the
Manufacturing method of coupons, see Experimental Techniques 40 (6),
1555-1565. The paper must rearrange the state of the art in order to
increase the odds to be accepted. This journal of SEM is important,
please check the work and others. Welding pores can be a serious
drawback in fatigue. Figure 1 is very related with the work proposed.
See also, Evolution of residual stress redistribution associated with
localized surface microcracking in shot-peened medium-carbon steel
during fatigue test, Pages 147-157, Jong-Cheon Kim, Seong-Kyun Cheong,
Hiroshi Noguchi
Regarding the link of the findings with design, please discuss the
matter, as it is done in International Journal of Fatigue,  Volume 55,
October 2013,  Pages 230-244, brings a fresh view of fatigue calculus.
"

Please revise your manuscript according to the above comments and
resubmit your revised version into the system in 3 days. If there is any
questions, please feel free to contact me.

Thank you for your cooperation. Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,

Celina Zou, MSc.
Assistant Editor
E-Mail: celina.zou@mdpi.com

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有3人回复
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言已经有3人回复
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章已经有10人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有5人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有8人回复
26申博自荐已经有7人回复
想换工作。大多数高校都是评职称时认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？已经有4人回复
带资进组求博导收留已经有9人回复
求助大佬们，伤口沾上了乙腈已经有6人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答已经有142人回复
SCI投稿过程总结已经有124人回复

人要从不假思索的蒙昧中挣脱

1楼 2017-09-05 21:40:30

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

tju_minifish

铜虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 93
帖子: 6
在线: 12.2小时
虫号: 3583088
注册: 2014-12-08
性别: MM
专业: 金属材料的力学行为

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by 糖泡泡就是我 at 2017-09-05 22:24:53
那你就改呗，还有啥疑问

主要是想知道为什么编辑在第一封里面的意思是修改格式和语言问题吗？在第二封第二段“The paper must rearrange the state of the art in order to
increase the odds to be accepted.”这是建议修改文章结构吗？可是又只给了3天时间，所给参考文献与我文章内容相关性并不是很强