24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2575  |  回复: 20

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


已领完
请问下面的是大修小修,感觉就4条意见
领取红包 (小木虫手机app专属红包)

扫一扫,下载小木虫客户端

Revision with justification of criticisms
Reviewer #1: The paper titled as "Effects of Nano-silica and Rock Asphalt on Rheological Properties of Modified Bitumen" contains important information. In the study, nano-silica and rock asphalt were used separately and together in bitumen modification. But, how the rates of additives used are chosen is not explained. The BBR test should be performed on the PAV residue. But, the rheological evaluation was done only on the original binders. Experiments should also be carried out on short and long term aged samples in order to make detailed rheological evaluation. Although the use of nano-silica in the study increased the value of G*/sin <delta>, the performance grade high temperature value (PG 70) did not change. Therefore, it contributes to the formation of permanent deformation. The cause of this situation, which is not suitable for the literature, should be explained. Some minor errors identified in the study are indicated in the following file.
I think that it is not appropriate to print this work in Journal of Construction and Building Materials without stated corrections.




Reviewer #3: The paper presents a comprehensive study on the effect of different combinations of rock asphalt and nano-silica on binder properties at different proportions. The researchers have done a good amount of work to come to the conclusions made on the paper. The statistical analysis and discussions are corroborated by the data presented.

However, the authors need to thoroughly check the grammar of the paper. Typos like "conbinations", "creaking"and many more exist. Choice of wrong words also exist such as: In line 7 of the abstract, "viscometer" needs to replaced by "viscosity".

发自小木虫IOS客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

定宝

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
据说需要补充实验的,就是大修,只用改动文字内容的,是小修,不一定正确,不过不论大小,都要修,无所谓的,只要在截稿前完成工作就好,加油,

发自小木虫IOS客户端
15楼2017-08-24 22:03:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


7楼2017-08-24 21:22:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


Revision with justification of criticisms

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2017-08-24 21:23:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


9楼2017-08-24 21:23:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

阿水mummy

木虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
不管大修小修都要按照大修来认真修改,审稿人提出的问题认真回复,看着也不难回复

发自小木虫Android客户端
10楼2017-08-24 21:24:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
10楼: Originally posted by 阿水mummy at 2017-08-24 21:24:27
不管大修小修都要按照大修来认真修改,审稿人提出的问题认真回复,看着也不难回复

嗯嗯,谢谢

发自小木虫IOS客户端
11楼2017-08-24 21:34:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to consider your paper for publication.

发自小木虫IOS客户端
12楼2017-08-24 21:42:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


13楼2017-08-24 21:42:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
15楼: Originally posted by 定宝 at 2017-08-24 22:03:47
据说需要补充实验的,就是大修,只用改动文字内容的,是小修,不一定正确,不过不论大小,都要修,无所谓的,只要在截稿前完成工作就好,加油,

谢谢

发自小木虫IOS客户端
16楼2017-08-24 22:08:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名


本帖仅楼主可见
18楼2017-08-24 23:11:57
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

翃空

新虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
18楼: Originally posted by bhl321023 at 2017-08-24 23:11:57
这么明显的大修。

好吧

发自小木虫IOS客户端
19楼2017-08-25 12:16:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2017-08-24 21:22   回复  
翃空(金币+1): 谢谢参与
已获得1个金币 发自小木虫Android客户端
2017-08-24 21:22   回复  
翃空(金币+1): 谢谢参与
已获得1个金币 发自小木虫Android客户端
pandongzi4楼
2017-08-24 21:22   回复  
翃空(金币+1): 谢谢参与
已获得1个金币 发自小木虫IOS客户端
holypower5楼
2017-08-24 21:22   回复  
翃空(金币+1): 谢谢参与
已获得1个金币 发自小木虫Android客户端
澜酒6楼
2017-08-24 21:22   回复  
翃空(金币+1): 谢谢参与
已获得1个金币 发自小木虫Android客户端
翃空14楼
2017-08-24 21:48   回复  
引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by 翃空 at 2017-08-24 21:42:45 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to consider you ...

1 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2017-08-24 23:07   回复  
翃空20楼
2017-08-27 10:48   回复  
翃空21楼
2017-09-04 09:35   回复  
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 翃空 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +15 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 17/850 2026-08-27 11:18 by xxniao123
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +4 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 4/200 2026-08-27 10:53 by chengyan1220
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 17/850 2026-08-27 08:20 by 大萍1987
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 02:01 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +10 董八千 2026-08-26 10/500 2026-08-26 16:30 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +5 huang1991js 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 16:09 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 范进中举一文的中心思想 +9 炎黄贵胄 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-26 15:40 by semaglutide
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +23 koalala 2026-08-24 26/1300 2026-08-26 14:29 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +11 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-25 11:04 by 孤独的英雄6
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +13 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 14/700 2026-08-25 09:10 by mrkang
[基金申请] 建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点 +13 kulium 2026-08-21 16/800 2026-08-24 16:27 by superceng
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
信息提示
请填处理意见