24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3246  |  回复: 17
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者xuezhaoteng将赠送您 5 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xuezhaoteng

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] CC增加作者如何恢复?已有4人参与

Thank you for the submission of your revised manuscript. I note that a co-author has been added to the manuscript since the initial submission. In such instances, in line with our ethical guidelines (https://www.rsc.org/journals-boo ... r-responsibilities), we require a justification for their inclusion as a co-author, as well as an email of consent from all the authors (including the co-author that has been added to the manuscript) confirming that they are happy with the change to the author list. Ideally this will be in the form of an email from each co-author. The emails should preferably be from the university or institution address of the relevant authors. This process is simply so we can be sure that the co-author to be added to the manuscript has contributed sufficiently to the manuscript and that all authors agree to this change. Please could you collect these emails and forward them to me at your earliest convenience? When I receive this information from all parties I will continue with the processing of your manuscript.
>
CC修改稿增加了一个作者,结果回来这么一封邮件,该怎么给他回答呢。
下面是我回答的形式:
Dear Dr. Editor

I am sincerely grateful to you for your advice about our revised manuscript (ID CC-COM-07-2017-XXXXX.R2). Here we give a statement to specify the contribution of each other in the revised manuscript as follows:

XXX, as corresponding author, proposes the ideas and designs the experiment.

XXX, as a postgraduate, performs the experiment.

XXX gives a contribution in response to the Referee’s question in revised manuscript. So, the author was added to the revised manuscript.

XXX, as corresponding author, gives a contribution in the experiment design and performance.

All authors have agreed to the signature and the change to the author list.
I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the reviewers concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.



Best Regards
这样回答是否合适恰当,还是必须每个作者都以邮件的形式的给他回复呢?请有经验的虫虫吗指点。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xuezhaoteng

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by secywq at 2017-08-22 18:41:04
主编的意思好像是要所有作者发email给你,你汇总后再FW给他。关键加作者要有明确的理由。

FW是什么东东啊?
9楼2017-08-22 19:30:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 18 个回答

baojames

木虫 (著名写手)


sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-08-27 11:34:07
加作者确实麻烦,要征得其他人同意,主要看期刊的guide,我那个时候做法呢,不加,等下一篇再加

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2017-08-22 18:12:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xuezhaoteng

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by baojames at 2017-08-22 18:12:13
加作者确实麻烦,要征得其他人同意,主要看期刊的guide,我那个时候做法呢,不加,等下一篇再加

我修改稿中已经加了,现在不能在删除撤回了吧。
3楼2017-08-22 18:24:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

secywq

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-08-27 11:34:23
主编的意思好像是要所有作者发email给你,你汇总后再FW给他。关键加作者要有明确的理由。

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2017-08-22 18:41:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见