| 查看: 3501 | 回复: 17 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者xuezhaoteng将赠送您 5 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
xuezhaoteng金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
CC增加作者如何恢复？ 已有4人参与
|
||
|
Thank you for the submission of your revised manuscript. I note that a co-author has been added to the manuscript since the initial submission. In such instances, in line with our ethical guidelines (https://www.rsc.org/journals-boo ... r-responsibilities), we require a justification for their inclusion as a co-author, as well as an email of consent from all the authors (including the co-author that has been added to the manuscript) confirming that they are happy with the change to the author list. Ideally this will be in the form of an email from each co-author. The emails should preferably be from the university or institution address of the relevant authors. This process is simply so we can be sure that the co-author to be added to the manuscript has contributed sufficiently to the manuscript and that all authors agree to this change. Please could you collect these emails and forward them to me at your earliest convenience? When I receive this information from all parties I will continue with the processing of your manuscript. > CC修改稿增加了一个作者，结果回来这么一封邮件，该怎么给他回答呢。 下面是我回答的形式： Dear Dr. Editor I am sincerely grateful to you for your advice about our revised manuscript (ID CC-COM-07-2017-XXXXX.R2). Here we give a statement to specify the contribution of each other in the revised manuscript as follows: XXX, as corresponding author, proposes the ideas and designs the experiment. XXX, as a postgraduate, performs the experiment. XXX gives a contribution in response to the Referee’s question in revised manuscript. So, the author was added to the revised manuscript. XXX, as corresponding author, gives a contribution in the experiment design and performance. All authors have agreed to the signature and the change to the author list. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the reviewers concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication. Best Regards 这样回答是否合适恰当，还是必须每个作者都以邮件的形式的给他回复呢？请有经验的虫虫吗指点。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
287求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
325求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
343求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂推荐 材料 304
已经有4人回复
-
316求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
351求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
349求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
材料学硕333求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
342求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
调剂求收留
已经有7人回复
baojames
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1205.3
- 散金: 3456
- 红花: 8
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 2614
- 在线: 700.8小时
- 虫号: 4381648
- 注册: 2016-01-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学和光电子材料
|
不成熟的建议，先按编辑说的，每个人要一份，学生的简单，不会不配合，老师的话你把声明写好给他签字，再扫描成电子版就行。编辑只是怕到时版权争议这些，要有签字这些保证。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
10楼2017-08-22 21:02:23
baojames
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1205.3
- 散金: 3456
- 红花: 8
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 2614
- 在线: 700.8小时
- 虫号: 4381648
- 注册: 2016-01-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学和光电子材料
★
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-08-27 11:34:07
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-08-27 11:34:07
|
加作者确实麻烦，要征得其他人同意，主要看期刊的guide，我那个时候做法呢，不加，等下一篇再加 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2017-08-22 18:12:13
xuezhaoteng
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 737.7
- 散金: 99
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 306
- 在线: 269.1小时
- 虫号: 1015071
- 注册: 2010-05-10
- 专业: 生化分析及生物传感
3楼2017-08-22 18:24:10
secywq
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 19495.8
- 散金: 4
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 2293
- 在线: 119.6小时
- 虫号: 278527
- 注册: 2006-09-10
- 专业: 药物化学
【答案】应助回帖
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-08-27 11:34:23
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-08-27 11:34:23
|
主编的意思好像是要所有作者发email给你，你汇总后再FW给他。关键加作者要有明确的理由。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
4楼2017-08-22 18:41:04
