| 查看: 3290 | 回复: 17 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者xuezhaoteng将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
xuezhaoteng金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
CC增加作者如何恢复? 已有4人参与
|
|
|
Thank you for the submission of your revised manuscript. I note that a co-author has been added to the manuscript since the initial submission. In such instances, in line with our ethical guidelines (https://www.rsc.org/journals-boo ... r-responsibilities), we require a justification for their inclusion as a co-author, as well as an email of consent from all the authors (including the co-author that has been added to the manuscript) confirming that they are happy with the change to the author list. Ideally this will be in the form of an email from each co-author. The emails should preferably be from the university or institution address of the relevant authors. This process is simply so we can be sure that the co-author to be added to the manuscript has contributed sufficiently to the manuscript and that all authors agree to this change. Please could you collect these emails and forward them to me at your earliest convenience? When I receive this information from all parties I will continue with the processing of your manuscript. > CC修改稿增加了一个作者,结果回来这么一封邮件,该怎么给他回答呢。 下面是我回答的形式: Dear Dr. Editor I am sincerely grateful to you for your advice about our revised manuscript (ID CC-COM-07-2017-XXXXX.R2). Here we give a statement to specify the contribution of each other in the revised manuscript as follows: XXX, as corresponding author, proposes the ideas and designs the experiment. XXX, as a postgraduate, performs the experiment. XXX gives a contribution in response to the Referee’s question in revised manuscript. So, the author was added to the revised manuscript. XXX, as corresponding author, gives a contribution in the experiment design and performance. All authors have agreed to the signature and the change to the author list. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the reviewers concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication. Best Regards 这样回答是否合适恰当,还是必须每个作者都以邮件的形式的给他回复呢?请有经验的虫虫吗指点。 |
» 猜你喜欢
自荐读博
已经有9人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
peterflyer
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
peterflyer
- 应助: 20282 (院士)
- 金币: 145890
- 红花: 1374
- 帖子: 93089
- 在线: 7693.9小时
- 虫号: 1482829
- 注册: 2011-11-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
16楼2017-08-26 10:19:32







回复此楼