| ²é¿´: 918 | »Ø¸´: 2 | ||||
½úÅô°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
|
[½»Á÷]
[ÓÅÐãÎÄÕÂÍÆ¼ö]ÖпÆÔº½Òʾ¶³ÍÁ̼ѻ·¶ÔÆøºò±äůÏìÓ¦ ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|
Ò°ÍâÔöÎÂʵÑé·¢ÏÖÆøºò±äů½ö´Ù½øÉú³¤¼¾Ç°ÆÚ×ܳõ¼¶Éú²úÁ¦ ¡¡¡¡Öйú¿ÆÑ§ÔºÖ²ÎïÑо¿Ëù»ñϤ£¬¸ÃËùÑо¿Ô±ÑîÔªºÏÑо¿×éµÄ×îÐÂÒ»ÏîÑо¿½ÒʾÁËÆøºò±äů¶Ô¶³ÍÁ̼ѻ·µÄÖ±½ÓЧӦ¼°Æäµ÷¿ØÒòËØ¡£Ïà¹ØÑо¿ÂÛÎĽüÈÕÔÚÏß·¢±íÔÚ¡¶Éú̬ѧ£¨Ecology£©¡·ÔÓÖ¾ÉÏ¡£ ¡¡¡¡¶³ÍÁÇø´¢´æ×Å´óÁ¿Óлú̼£¬Í¬Ê±Ò²¾ÀúÁËÏÔÖøµÄÆøºò±äů¡£´óÁ¿Ñо¿ÏÔʾ£¬¶³ÍÁÉú̬ϵͳ̼ѻ·¶ÔÆøºò±äůʮ·ÖÃô¸Ð¡£ÕâÊÇÒòΪһ·½Ã棬ζÈÉÏÉý»áÌá¸ßÍÁÈÀ΢ÉúÎï»îÐÔ£¬½ø¶ø¼ÓËÙÉú̬ϵͳ̼ÊÍ·Å£»ÁíÒ»·½Ãæ£¬Æøºò±äůҲ»á´Ù½øÍÁÈÀµªÁ׿󻯣¬´Ù½øÖ²ÎïÉú³¤£¬½ø¶øÔö¼ÓÉú̬ϵͳ̼¹Ì¶¨¡£È»¶ø£¬Ñ§Êõ½çÆù½ñÈÔ²»Çå³þÔöÎÂÒýÆðµÄÑø·Ö±ä»¯¾¿¾¹ÈçºÎµ÷¿Ø¶³ÍÁÉú̬ϵͳ̼½»»»¹ý³Ì¡£ Éú³¤¼¾Ç°ÆÚ×ܳõ¼¶Éú²úÁ¦¶ÔÔöεÄÏìÓ¦ÊÜζȺÍÖ²±»Ö¸ÊýµÄ¹²Í¬Ó°Ï죨a-b£©£¬¶øÉú³¤¼¾ºóÆÚµÄÏìÓ¦ÔòÊÜÖ²ÎïÑø·ÖµÄµ÷¿Ø£¨c-d£© ¡¡¡¡ÎªÁ˽â¾öÉÏÊö¿ÆÑ§ÎÊÌ⣬Öйú¿ÆÑ§ÔºÖ²ÎïÑо¿ËùÑîÔªºÏÑо¿×éÑ¡ÔñÇà²Ø¸ßÔ¶àÄê¶³ÍÁÇøÄڵĸߺ®ÕÓÔ󻯲ݵéÕâÒ»ÀàÌØÊâµÄÉú̬ϵͳ£¬±ÜÃâÁËÒÔÍùÔöÎÂʵÑéÖС°Î¶ÈÉÏÉýÒýÆðÍÁÈÀº¬Ë®Á¿Ï½µ¡±µÄȱÏÝ£¬½ø¶ø½ÒʾÁËÆøºò±äů¶Ô¶³ÍÁ̼ѻ·µÄÖ±½ÓЧӦ¼°Æäµ÷¿ØÒòËØ¡£Í¨¹ý2014ÄêÖÁ2016ÄêÁ¬Ðø3¸öÉú³¤¼¾µÄÒ°Íâ¼à²â£¬Ñо¿ÈËÔ±·¢ÏÖζÈÉÏÉýÔö¼ÓÁËÉú³¤¼¾Ç°ÆÚÉú̬ϵͳ̼¹Ì¶¨£¬µ«ÕâÖÖ´Ù½øÐ§Ó¦ÔÚÉú³¤¼¾ºóÆÚÏûʧ£¬ÕâÒ»ÏÖÏóÖ÷ÒªÓëÖ²ÎïÌáǰ˥ÀÏÒýÆðµÄҶƬµªÁ×Ũ¶ÈϽµÓйء£ÉÏÊö½á¹û±íÃ÷£¬ÔöÎÂÒýÆðµÄÖ²ÎïÑø·Ö±ä»¯²¢Ã»ÓÐÔö¼ÓÉú̬ϵͳµÄ̼¹Ì¶¨£¬·´¶øÒÖÖÆÁËÔöζÔÉú̬ϵͳ̼¹Ì¶¨µÄ´Ù½øÐ§Ó¦¡£ ¡¡¡¡¸ÃÑо¿ÎªÈÏÊ¶Æøºò±äů±³¾°ÏÂÉú̬ϵͳ̼-µª-Á×½»»¥×÷ÓÃÌṩÁËÐÂÊӽǣ¬¶ÔÀí½â¶³ÍÁ̼ѻ·ÓëÆøºò±äů֮¼äµÄ·´À¡¹ØÏµ¾ßÓÐÖØÒªÆôʾ¡£Ïà¹Ø½á¹û²¢²»Ö§³ÖѧÊõ½ç¹ØÓÚ¡°Æøºò±äůÒýÆðµÄÑø·Ö±ä»¯ÓÐÀûÓÚÉú̬ϵͳ̼¹Ì¶¨¡±µÄ´«Í³ÈÏʶ£¬Òâζ×ÅÆøºò±äůÇé¾°ÏÂÑø·Ö¶ÔÉú̬ϵͳ̼½»»»µÄµ÷¿Ø±ÈÒÔÍùÔ¤ÏëµÄ¸üΪ¸´ÔÓ¡£ ¡¡¡¡Large uncertainties exist in carbon (C)-climate feedback in permafrost regions, partly due to an insufficient understanding of warming effects on nutrient availabilities and their subsequent impacts on vegetation C sequestration. Although a warming climate may promote a substantial release of soil C to the atmosphere, a warming-induced increase in soil nutrient availability may enhance plant productivity, thus offsetting C loss from microbial respiration. Here, we present evidence that the positive temperature effect on carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes may be weakened by reduced plant nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) concentrations in a Tibetan permafrost ecosystem. Although experimental warming initially enhanced ecosystem CO2 uptake, the increased rate disappeared after the period of peak plant growth during the early growing season, even though soil moisture was not a limiting factor in this swamp meadow ecosystem. We observed that warming did not significantly affect soil extractable N or P during the period of peak growth, but decreased both N and P concentrations in the leaves of dominant plant species, likely caused by accelerated plant senescence in the warmed plots. The attenuated warming effect on CO2 assimilation during the late growing season was associated with lowered leaf N and P concentrations. These findings suggest that warming-mediated nutrient changes may not always benefit ecosystem C uptake in permafrost regions, making our ability to predict the C balance in these warming-sensitive ecosystems more challenging than previously thought. |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
Å©ÁÖ½øÕ¹ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
081700£¬311£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
081700ѧ˶£¬323·Ö£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúº£Ñó´óѧÇóµ÷¼ÁѧУ
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶ 285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
0702ÎïÀíѧѧ˶299Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£©
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶329 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´

Óê¹ûÊ÷
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 385.8
- Ìû×Ó: 15
- ÔÚÏß: 13.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 6777187
- ×¢²á: 2017-06-18
- רҵ: »·¾³Î¢ÉúÎïѧ
2Â¥2017-08-17 21:58:39
|
3Â¥2017-08-18 17:35:30














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥